I slightly disagree on the triggering event for RBG becoming the liberal equivalent of Dubya, i.e. he was liked by conservatives until we saw how he ultimately wasn't good except for keeping Gore and Lurch from the WH. For all of RBG's liberal qualities etc, her SCOTUS jurisprudence hasn't left a mark. Her legal philosophy is best described as anti-American..well, whoop de do..all she did was join the club of every other left-leaning statist. She didn't really become a "go to" justice who influenced others, like Scalia or Thomas. She didn't really leave a wake of people who aspire to adjudicate like her. She's no different from any other loser of her ilk. Indeed, looking at her Martin-Quinn score, she's just another lib:
Thus, the time when she will become a chew toy is when her replacement, say, Justice Barrett, writes the 5-4 opinion in some landmark case (e.g. overturning Roe or Kelo). At that moment, mark my words, the monuments they erected for RBG will come down faster than a house of cards.