Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hydroxychloroquine ineffective as a preventive antiviral against COVID-19: study
Medical Express ^ | 08/18/2020 | by Case Western Reserve University

Posted on 08/18/2020 8:04:28 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

Researchers at Case Western Reserve University have added to the growing body of understanding about how hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is not a possible defense against COVID-19.

Specifically, they found that HCQ is not effective in preventing COVID-19 in patients with lupus and rheumatoid arthritis (RA), suggesting a broader interpretation of HCQ as ineffective preventive medicine for the general population. Their findings were recently published in the Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases.

Many researchers have focused on patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and RA because HCQ is frequently taken by these patients. Anecdotal reports in the early stages of the pandemic showed these patients were not getting COVID-19. Earlier researchers then explored HCQ in the lab and found it effective against the virus, in addition to its already established anti-inflammatory properties, so testing in people for prevention or treatment at first held some promise. Since those early tests, various more recent studies have shown that HCQ is not effective in treating moderate-to-severe hospitalized cases. Treatment with HCQ early in the disease or for mild cases is still under review.

"Our study shows, with a large degree of confidence, that HCQ is ineffective as a preventive antiviral in people with SLE and/or RA taking drugs that suppress their immune system, putting them at greater risk," said Mendel Singer, Ph.D., MPH, lead author and associate professor and vice chair for education in the Department of Population & Quantitative Health Sciences at the Case Western Reserve School of Medicine. "Given how the study was structured, one can make an educated extension that it is not effective in preventing COVID-19 in people without those conditions. It is not uncommon for something to show promise in the lab, and then prove ineffective in the more complex biological landscape of humans."

The Case Western Reserve team drew on a large national database, pulling de-identified patient data from 36 health systems, to compile a much larger study than previous work, looking at patients with SLE and/or RA and their health outcomes related to their use of HCQ. Prior studies had fewer than 20 COVID-19 patients with SLE and/or RA; this study had 159. This study showed that patients with SLE and/or RA who contracted COVID-19 were just as likely to be taking HCQ as SLE and/or RA patients who did not get COVID-19.

"By drawing on data from a relatively large patient population with lupus and/or RA, we can offer a higher level of confidence in our findings," said Singer. "We see from this large retrospective review that this drug is ineffective in preventing COVID-19 in these patients who have been taking HCQ. If HCQ were effective in prevention, we would have seen fewer HCQ-taking SLE/RA patients with COVID-19, but did not. This likely means that HCQ is not active against the SARS-CoV-2 virus in humans—versus in the lab—and is unlikely to be an effective preventive antiviral for anyone."


TOPICS: Health/Medicine; Science; Society
KEYWORDS: antiviral; covid19; hcqtreatment; hydroxychloroquine; politicalmedicine; prophylaxis
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: SeekAndFind
What Case Western’s study is telling us is — it doesn’t work.

No it only shows no statistical benefit with people who suffer from immune disorders such as Lupus and RA.

It is proven as a general anti viral preventive for The malaria virus. It has a 60 year proven track record as anti viral.

The headline is deceptive. It was a limited study. It proves nothing.

21 posted on 08/18/2020 8:21:11 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (Freep mail me if you want to be on my Fingerstyle Acoustic Guitar Ping List)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Specifically, they found that HCQ is not effective in preventing COVID-19 in patients with lupus and rheumatoid arthritis (RA), suggesting a broader interpretation of HCQ as ineffective preventive medicine...

Isn't that like saying chemo-therapy doesn't work for every cancer patient, so it's useless against cancer?

Hell of an implication....

22 posted on 08/18/2020 8:22:12 AM PDT by jeffc (I'm a Patriot, and the media are our enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

A large retrospective study that analyzed 159 patient...
It’s a little suspicious that this study did not evaluate the total # of patients with Lupus & RA and compare the # of cases of COVID to # of cases in age matched controls.
I smell cherries being picked. They also don’t tell us how the patient’s COVID status was addressed and whether their courses were mild or severe.
This was a study either poorly designed or rushed out to support an agenda as was the last retracted study.


23 posted on 08/18/2020 8:23:13 AM PDT by JayGalt (You can't teach a donkey how to tap dance. Nemo me impune lacessit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

Here is a study Dr. Vladimir Zelenko endorses in Hi Tweet:

https://twitter.com/zev_dr/status/1260969607592099844?lang=en

COVID-19 Prophylaxis With Hydroxychloroquine Associated With Zinc For High-Risk Healthcare Workers - Full Text View - https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04384458

TITLE: COVID-19 Prophylaxis With Hydroxychloroquine Associated With Zinc For High-Risk Healthcare Workers

Unfortunately, we won’t have the result of the above study until October 2020 ( as the study description tells us ).


24 posted on 08/18/2020 8:25:01 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

Take a look at the conflicts of interest disclosed!

Competing interests PK reports personal fees from GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi-Aventis, Pfizer, Abbvie, Novartis Pharma, Eli Lilly and Bristol-Myers Squibb. FB reports personal fees from Boehringer, Bone Therapeutics, Expanscience, Galapagos, Gilead, GSK, Merck Sereno, MSD, Nordic, Novartis, Pfizer, Regulaxis, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, Servier, UCB, Peptinov, TRB Chemedica and 4P Pharma. AHK reports grants from National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) and Rheumatology Research Foundation and personal fees from Exagen Diagnostics, Inc. and GlaxoSmithKline. Drs Liew and Graef have disclosed no conflicts of interest or competing interests. JAS reports grants from NIH/NIAMS/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases/Autoimmune Centers of Excellence, the Rheumatology Research Foundation, the Brigham Research Institute, and the R. Bruce and Joan M. Mickey Research Scholar Fund as well as personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, Inova, Janssen and Optum.


25 posted on 08/18/2020 8:25:08 AM PDT by bhl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Pollard

The body normally has some stores of zinc, from dietary sources, which is utilized in a number of processes in the body, one of which is to tune up the immune responses. In those instances where HCQ is already being administered, the synergistic effect with the bodily stores of zinc with HCQ effectively protects those patients from COVID-19 Wuhan virus, resulting in very low infection rates.


26 posted on 08/18/2020 8:26:26 AM PDT by alloysteel (Freedom is not a matter of life and death. It is much more serious than that..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The things I have heard have worked as a preventative were nicotine, selenium and the anti-TB vaccine


27 posted on 08/18/2020 8:36:50 AM PDT by AppyPappy (How many fingers am I holding up, Winston?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“preventing COVID-19 “

I also thought that it was not intended to prevent but to lessen the symptoms


28 posted on 08/18/2020 8:37:57 AM PDT by AppyPappy (How many fingers am I holding up, Winston?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I take HCQ and Zinc (Picolinate) prophylactically, and I AM in the high-risk category, by age and profession.
Younger co-worker who works with me in the same room got the CHINESE VIRUS.

I did not.

29 posted on 08/18/2020 8:46:46 AM PDT by spankalib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

Says it all! Good post


30 posted on 08/18/2020 8:50:15 AM PDT by Jan_Sobieski (Sanctification)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Nothingburger

Yep, there are already studies out there showing HCQ w/o zinc is ineffective.


31 posted on 08/18/2020 8:52:25 AM PDT by sevlex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: spankalib

RE: I take HCQ and Zinc (Picolinate) prophylactically, and I AM in the high-risk category, by age and profession

I am just curious. Did a doctor prescribe HCQ to you? How are you able to use this prophylactically when so many states in the USA do not allow its use ( the most generous ones only allow it for hospitalized patients ).


32 posted on 08/18/2020 8:57:47 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

RE: I also thought that it was not intended to prevent but to lessen the symptoms

See Post #14 above.

Many are using HCQ for PROPHYLAXIS against Covid-19. In fact, Trump did just that for himself — taking HCQ as a preventative.

What Case Western’s study is telling us is — it doesn’t work.


33 posted on 08/18/2020 8:58:52 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: bobrlbob

RE: Another BS study

Can you elaborate?


34 posted on 08/18/2020 8:59:12 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989

RE: I think “preventative” is the key word here.

Yes it is. And the Case Western study tells us that it DOES NOT prevent Covid-19


35 posted on 08/18/2020 8:59:49 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Nobody said HCQ was a preventative. It’s used early on as an effective treatment coupled with zinc and an antibiotic. No need for Gates DNA altering frankencine.


36 posted on 08/18/2020 9:00:47 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pepsi_junkie

RE: Here they found 159 people who have Lupus or rheumatoid arthritis and got COVID (just 159!) and half of them were on HCQ.

And of course, not mention of the use of ZINC, which is supposed to work SYNERGISTICALLY with HCQ to fight Covid-19 ( as per Dr. Vladimir Zelenko ). You can’t have one without the other for Covid-19.


37 posted on 08/18/2020 9:02:44 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: RatRipper

RE: Their low infection rates are attributed to use of HCQ for malaria

Have they factored in THE NUMBER OF TESTS made in these countries? The USA has as of today, over 65 million tests made. How many tests have these third world countries made on their population? Could that low level to testing not account for the low infection count?


38 posted on 08/18/2020 9:04:58 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Prolixus
Who would expect hydroxychloroquine to be antiviral?

Most researchers working on SARS viruses. In 2004 it was known. You can read an example paper here, and another one here.

More recently there have been many research papers showing the hydroxychloroquine is an effective anti-viral against COVID-19 in vitro.

Here is one example

39 posted on 08/18/2020 9:15:20 AM PDT by freeandfreezing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Simple solution to the pandemic,,,,Make HCQ and Azithromycin OTC drugs so anyone who develops a cough and/or fever can go the nearest drug store and self medicate with the drugs along with Zinc Sulfate with correct dosage within 48 hours of symptoms and pandemic over.,,,,,instead of waiting a few days to get tested and 5 days for the results,,,,if over 60 years of age,,,,you’re dead.


40 posted on 08/18/2020 9:18:01 AM PDT by chopperk (L)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson