[enumerated]

Classic straw-man ploy:

Attempt to discredit evidence based Spy-gate allegations by conflating them with wacky Q theories and failed Q predictions.

This is a perfect example of why Q is not just harmless sport - Q (
Qgives the Left a perfect tool for making serious evidence-based allegations look like crack pot theories.

[eldoradude]

So why does the MSM go so far out of their way to attempt to discredit Q drops?

Why has facebook worked so hard to delete so many accounts spreading something that is allegedly so useful to the left.

Why does twitter do the same?

All for a fraud?

[bagster]

Attempt to discredit evidence based Spy-gate allegations by conflating them with wacky Q theories and failed Q predictions.

You're absolutely right. This is a time tested tactic of the derps. First, label something or someone a whack conspiracy theory, and then tag any information that goes against [Them] with that whack conspiracy theory.

That method was developed by the CIA during the JFK assassination investigation and has worked amazingly well ever since, with the unknowing and willing cooperation of people like you.

Great job, patriot.

And for the record, there are no 'wacky Q theories'. They don't become wacky just because you and the derps say so.

#YouAreBeingLiedTo

[grey_whiskers]

Other way around.

Q was on the spying on the President long before anyone else took it seriously.

[epluribus_2]

You win this critical thinking exercise.

[USMC79to83]

...failed Q predictions

If this is the case, it should be easy for you to list a few.

Please proceed