The Blackstone Ratio is not in the founding documents, but the idea was used in their development.
****************************
Had to look it up and I agree with the principle.
My concern is that the obviously guilty, like bill & hill,
absent slam dunk, will not be indicted, even though there
is a possibility they could be found guilty at trial. The other side does that all the time, albeit with crooked judges.
Why do you assert this:
“My concern is that the obviously guilty, like bill & hill,
absent slam dunk, will not be indicted, even though there
is a possibility they could be found guilty at trial.”
???? How do you say they will not be indicted? You cannot see the future. Did you not read the Q drops as they came out, and supportive evidence? You think Trump’s DoJ is going to let them off for some reason? That there is not enought evidence?
I’ve been rolling a though around in muh head.
We are so used to seeing perps brought up on multiple charges just to make sure the jury will convict on at least one.
What if we see the highest of the cabal brought up on a single charge.
-Treason
-Crimes against humanity (pedo-trafficking)
Then, lay it bare for all America to see.
Video
Photos
Emails
Not likely cuz Barr/Trump don’t indulge in drama.
Still, an interesting concept.
I hear you.
Carry on.