Why do you assert this:
“My concern is that the obviously guilty, like bill & hill,
absent slam dunk, will not be indicted, even though there
is a possibility they could be found guilty at trial.”
???? How do you say they will not be indicted? You cannot see the future. Did you not read the Q drops as they came out, and supportive evidence? You think Trump’s DoJ is going to let them off for some reason? That there is not enought evidence?
Why do you assert this:
“My concern is that the obviously guilty, like bill & hill,
absent slam dunk, will not be indicted, even though there
is a possibility they could be found guilty at trial.”
???? How do you say they will not be indicted? You cannot see the future. Did you not read the Q drops as they came out, and supportive evidence? You think Trump’s DoJ is going to let them off for some reason? That there is not enought evidence?
*********************************
Should have said have not been indicted yet.
Not a wordsmith or lawfag. I hope you’re
more correct about
their indictment and don’t have to walk it back like you
did with Wray.