Q Anon: 07/07/20 Trust Trump's Plan ~ Vol.265, Q Day 984

qmap.pub ^ | 07/07/20 | FReepers and FReeQs, vanity

[little jeremiah]

POTUS’ extreme reaction is interesting and I am certain there is reason for it or resons.

[Miss Didi]

Your b’day is not today???

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

I have seen examples of the female given-name:
CAIGHTLYN
It’s a Scots/Welsh/Irish thing.

[defconw]

So? Satire is not allowed? Since when?

[defconw]

the legal principle of determining points in litigation according to precedent.

[grey_whiskers]

Well said Miss Didi!

[stylin19a]

sorry...stare decicis is where the courts follow prior precedents\rulings for other like cases.

In this case, they cite United States v. Burr, 25 F. Cas. 30, 33–34 from 1807

John Marshall, presiding as Circuit Justice for Virginia over the treason trial of Aaron Burr, granted
Burr’s motion for a sub-poena duces tecum directed at President Jefferson.
In rejecting the prosecution’s argument that a President was not subject to such a sub-poena, Marshall held
that a President does not “stand exempt” from the Sixth Amendment’s guarantee that the accused have
compulsory process for obtaining witnesses for their defense.

[Miss Didi]

Again, @RealDonaldTrump is right. He has been criminally victimized like no other president in history. https://t.co/MEcedB3FRP— Tom Fitton (@TomFitton) July 9, 2020

[MileHi]

Says it’s satire?

[little jeremiah]

Considering this and reading everyone’s comments, seems clear this is actually a good ruling in a sense. In a criminal investigation, all records are on the table.

And what Vance is doing as noted above, is not a criminal investigation, it’s a fishing expedition.

But there are PLENTY of criminal investigations going on!

[little jeremiah]

Thank you.

[stylin19a]

House doesn’t get Pres. Trump’s tax records...yet.
They kicked it back downstairs...

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/19-715_febh.pdf

[little jeremiah]

Hmm, so they could subpoena Pres. Jefferson’s documents because of someone else’s criminal acts?

[numberonepal]

It is NOT a verified account. But very interesting

He lost me with this:

What if I told you... I am Q.— Robert Trump (@BigRobTrump) July 9, 2020

He obviously doesn't understand Q. NO OUTSIDE COMMS BRO!

[defconw]

I post either I get ignored or blasted. I say decide for yourself. I see it as defensive deflection. They try to mock us into silence. Time will tell. :)

I report you decide. 1st Amendment and all.

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

We are seeing an influx of divisive scolds, lately.
Wonder why...

[M. Thatcher]

Duh, should have checked the thread before posting all of Trump’s tweets.

Actually, glad to see them again all together. Extremely important series of tweets, especially where he puts “Justice” – meaning the DOJ – in quotes. Tells me he’s furious at Barr’s DOJ slow-walking everything.

[Bigg Red]

::I’m thinking C is Gavin Newsome and the famous person who gave the start is Pelosi or Boxer.::

~~~~~~~~~~~

Nice work.

[M. Thatcher]

Remind me what “stare decisis” means

Standing on prior decision.

Upholding legal precedent.

[Bama_84_928]

My response was a comment, not a condemnation. Got my hopes up for a second, then crushed. :)