Posted on 06/01/2020 8:55:23 AM PDT by BenLurkin
What does Kimberly Wells say about this ?
Lunar warming!
Nuclear winter!
Johnny Winter!
Edgar
Winter
Thats speeding ticket music
Well, the Rats are otherwise occupied at the time.
I knew a guy in the 1990’s, a serious leftist, who scaled one of NASA’s walls or something to protest a launch with a nuclear reactor, was really upset at his treatment by cops, their twistie-tie handcuffs were too tight, poor food in the jail, LOL.
Wow, that was 30 years ago.
https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg12517060-100-protest-groups-move-to-halt-space-mission/
What about the “not in my backyard” crowd?
*ping*
Should look into Thorium based reactors.
Don’t forget about the Nazi base.
(Apollo 18 was it?)
What other choice would they have? There is no coal, water for dams, wind, and cant do solar since the moon has day/night cycles. Nuclear is their only option.
I don’t know much about nuclear power but I do know that every nuclear power plant is built next to a large body of water which is necessary to cool the reactors. Does nuclear power need oxygen?
A passive nuclear reactor sounds cool,
Though reviewing the story ( I know it violated FR norms)
Three government agencies work together to design and build a 10kw generator and after they spend untold monies it only produces 1/2 the intended power.
Perhaps I’m just being a cynic, but this sounds like typical government results.
Don't much care how they're powered, but this appears to be another ploy for continued involvement of our Russia enemy in our space program.
When you look at Space, Weight And Power (SWAP) tradeoffs, nothing comes close to nuclear in efficiency. For the smallest cubic space and weight, you get dramatically more power output.
Additionally, they can be ultra-reliable, which is a life or death issue in space.
You can have some solar panels, you can mine some fuel locally, but you need to have a (few) safely buried nuclear power source(s) to be sure of life support, and to get the heavy lifting done (figuratively speaking). Kilowatts from solar, megawatts from nuclear.
Good, we don’t want to see the damming of the moon’s rivers for generating hydroelectric power, it would affect the spawning of the lunar salmon.
But, but then we’ll get space warming.
Arggghhhhh, climate change in space!
And, of course, journalism majors will believe it.
How about we get back there first and then make decisions on powering a settlement?
I remember when the Cassini probe was launched, people were terribly concerned about the nuclear reactor suffering an accident near earth.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.