AG Barr “As to President Obama and VP Biden, whatever their level of involvement, based on the information I have today, I don’t expect Mr. Durham’s work will lead to a criminal investigation of either man. Our concern...is focused on others.
My take on this:
“I don’t expect...” Sometimes unexpected things happen.
“... based on the information I have today...” He might get new information. ;-)
“Mr. Durham’s work” Other people could be working on that.
“criminal investigation” IDK about this one. Are there other types of investigations?
“President 0vomit” Barr said nothing about Barry Soetoro or any other alias. Also 0vomit and Biteme are NO LONGER President or Vice President.
Maybe the investigation on both of them is already completed. In that case, no need for anything to “lead to it”.
SO MANY possibilities here.
AG Barr “As to President Obama and VP Biden, whatever their level of involvement, based on the information I have today, I don’t expect Mr. Durham’s work will lead to a criminal investigation of either man. Our concern...is focused on others.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Barr specified “information I have today” and Q emphasized that text.
Barr can have the needed information tomorrow, or on any other day the public is ready to start accepting their false god Obama may not have been anything like he portrayed himself. President Trump and others in his administration are becoming more public on Obama - and slowly we will see opinions offered about him that were previously verbotten. Today, the public is not ready.
Don't get your hopes up. No POTUS has ever been thrown into prison. Picture the first half black president in jail?
We shouldn't forget the popular view concerning Comey earlier, that he was being left perhaps totally unaccountable. Now the predominant view is there's no way he could be left off the hook concerning FISA and that it surely looks like a coup. If Barry is off now regarding FISA, only to face more solid treason under a different heading (e.g., using the IC and military for Fuddy's faked death), perhaps the goal of seeing Barry pay for his crimes will yet find fruition.
There's such a fertile field of Barry's criminality, it's almost preferred to see the best saved for last, lest we get quick vengeance and leave the media to bury and ignore a dozen other unexplored Barry scandals.
Joe will be gone before we know it. There certainly looks to be plenty of meat in the involvement of all the other Dems on the Ukrainian front. Joe's precedent-setting, extortive demand to fire the Ukrainian prosecutor must not be a get-out-of-jail-free card for the future of the Republic because it went unprosecuted. However, Durham's current charge is probably rightly viewed as an investigation limited to potential FISA wrongdoings.
Nonetheless, if FISA is just the start, so many things are seemingly connected to that, so it's hard to give a whitewash to "I don't expect Durham's work will lead to a criminal investigation of either man."
If FISA is a start, don't other things flow from that, as opposed to each of those things needing to find a brand new genesis?
I do agree a logical interpretation could simply be that sufficient investigation has already been accomplished by Durham. Durham's work won't lead to an investigation of [Barry or Biden], it'll only lead to i's being dotted, t's crossed and grand juries convened to return indictments.
In the legal world, using the term "upon information and belief" covers the CURRENT knowledge of the swearer. Sometimes, it is used trickily in a hurry before suspected information makes it up the pipeline.