[grey_whiskers]

Not only is this reversible error, but to my mind it breaks judicial immunity, as there is Supreme Court Precedent (9-0 ruling just a couple of days ago against the 9th Circus) that a court relying on amicus briefs instead of the case in front of it, is judicially invalid.

Yes, you *can* break judicial immunity: the actions have to be so egregious that they cease to be a legitimate judicial function. There were a pair of judges in Pennsylvania imprisoned for falsely sentencing minors and removing them from their families to the care of several group homes or such, where the judges received literal kickbacks from the operators of the group homes.

[Steven W.]

I heard some rumblings over the weekend that if Sullivan balked at the motion to dismiss that Sidney Powell could petition another (higher) court (DC Court of Appeals?) for a Writ of Mandamus

[VRWCarea51]

#789 An Error? Not in my mind. An intentional act.

At any rate, How can this Swamp Rat even consider this after evidence was presented to the court that Flynn was coerced to plead guilty to keep his kid from being legally harassed?

I don’t see how any of his actions can survive review.

He’s lost his freaking mind!