I’m so hoping you can enlighten me to your theory of this sting!
Wth did it gain in real life practical terms?
President Trump had handcuffs on for two plus years for this sting?
The taxpayers spent millions and millions of dollars for this sting?
Mushy middle m$m followers are convinced President Trump colluded with Russia for this sting?
Flynn was bankrupted and his reputation forever tainted for this sting?
Sessions is a punch line for this sting?
Seriously, there were NO other options to expose the rats in on these dirty games?
I honestly cannot see the logic behind this theory.
As I said the other day, if that’s the height of intelligent planning and I’m going to be good it was all a set up, count me out of future strategic planning cuz this is a dud.
Have you been reading all the Q drops and explanations for the last 2 plus years?
Just my two cents. To me it seems they had to do it this way.
Q post # 4121
Sometimes you can’t TELL the public the truth.
YOU MUST SHOW THEM.
ONLY THEN WILL PEOPLE FIND THE WILL TO CHANGE.
Q
Have to let things happen. Have to let the treasonous bastards run the length of the rope. Have to let a beautician in Texas get arrested. Have to let the American people see their rights eroding before their eyes to get them up off the couch. Have to let enough Americans get riled up enough to change things.
Even when you show some, they still won’t change their thinking.
Q post # 3029
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 58ea93 No.5629177
Mar 11 2019 17:30:49 (EST)
https://twitter.com/BuddhaKatze/status/1105228537190068224
4-6% [brainwashed] will never wake up even when presented w/ FACTS.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/the-historic-results-of-president-donald-j-trumps-first-two-years-in-office/
Q
___________________________________________________________
This can never be allowed to happen again
Q post # 2700
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 539e80 No.5140929
Feb 12 2019 11:34:13 (EST)
POTUS: “This can never be allowed to happen again (in our Country or to another President).”
How do you deter & prevent this from happening again?
Simply by terminating employment of those responsible?
Simply by conducting a few ‘non-threatening’ investigations?
Or by:
Prosecuting those responsible to the fullest extent of the law?
Setting up new checks & balances and oversight designed to increase transparency?
Provide OIG office(s) w/ funding inc (size) ++ authority?
Provide select committees w/ access and in-house viewing of non NAT SEC CLAS material?
Provide a check on Directors/Dep Directors/Asst Directors of all such ABC agencies?
Establish ‘financial checks/reviews’ of those in senior (critical) positions (audits) + direct family (close proximity)?
Transparency and Prosecution is the only way forward to save our Republic and safeguard such criminal and treasonous acts from occurring again.
While some want to quietly remove those responsible and go about our business (save face on the World Stage), those in control, understand, this band-aid will simply not work.
Nobody should be above the law (no matter how massive the spider-web is (entangled)).
This will never happen again.
TRUTH WORKS.
FACTS MATTER.
Q
WWG1WGA
Everyone here has a wild-eyed or sober theory.
Some folks think we are crazy and follow a LARP.
Hey, we don’t ask humblebumble to justify his snide posts.
To paraphrase Yoda,
agree or disagree
There is no prove it.
WWG1WGA
Revealing things too early, via Congressional hearings, would have resulted in lower level people being exposed and possibly indicted/convicted, but the upper echelons wouldn’t have been implicated. Time was needed for DOJ to build a more complete case that would expose things from top to bottom. This involved getting some of the lower level players to co-operate and turn on the those higher in the chain of command.
Until solid evidence could be gathered that Flynn was not just an isolated incident but rather part of a larger conspiracy to remove a sitting president - going all the way up to Obama and beyond- the left would spin any exposure of lower level FBI misconduct as nothing more than unintended mistakes at most. It simply requires time to build a conspiracy case over something this big. Waiting till the whole case is built just makes more sense. Exposing only part of the story early on wouldn’t have bought much. The MSM would have continued to spin, and the Dems in Congress would have continued to obstruct.
I’m so hoping you can enlighten me to your theory of this sting!
Wth did it gain in real life practical terms?
President Trump had handcuffs on for two plus years for this sting?
The taxpayers spent millions and millions of dollars for this sting?
Mushy middle m$m followers are convinced President Trump colluded with Russia for this sting?
Flynn was bankrupted and his reputation forever tainted for this sting?
Sessions is a punch line for this sting?
Seriously, there were NO other options to expose the rats in on these dirty games?
I honestly cannot see the logic behind this theory.
As I said the other day, if that’s the height of intelligent planning and I’m going to be good it was all a set up, count me out of future strategic planning cuz this is a dud.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I agree with you. I can’t imagine what the first 2-3 years of President Trump’s administration would have been like without the daily hammering of false accusations and the Mueller trial/hoax. The countless times President Trump turned to the cameras and said THIS IS A WITCH HUNT, and every time he did, patriots echoed his complaint and anger grew. And when the public is supposedly told it was all fake, the public is to understand President Trump was lying to them and claiming persecution by Dems and other Deep Staters when it was all his plan from the start, and they should vote him in for a second term as a result. OH, and when the sting is revealed, the public are believe Trump’s new assertions and revelations about the Deep State.
After the last time we debated the “sting” angle, a reliable, considerate FReeQ sent me a link to Brian Cates “response” (it reads like a response to our debate)and it is a disaster. Brian Cates explains that we may not like it, but the sting involves RR testifying against the black hats he supervised. Myeahhhhhhhhhh....
Personally, I think Cates doesn’t understand what entrapment is, so he provides an explanation tailored to help his sting theory while implying those who don’t understand the sting are the ones who don’t understand entrapment.
Here’s a link to a DOJ definition of entrapment for those curious:
https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm/criminal-resource-manual-645-entrapment-elements
RR appointed a Special Counsel even though no crime had been committed. That was loudly talked about when he appointed Mueller, “How can he appoint an SC when none of the faked charges are a crime?” Without RR’s active oversight and support on a daily basis for 2.5+ years, the Mueller probe would have stopped. It was RR’s job to know the contents of the case and the reasoning for calling witnesses - complete supervision. And then the public is supposed to understand that President Trump’s supposed “white hats” needed to lead, facilitate and implement criminal actions so they could testify against those whom they supervised????
THIS is the “best way” to catch people who lied on paper, signed fake documents, purchased, inserted and used a fake dossier without covering their tracks because THEY NEVER THOUGHT SHE WOULD LOSE and when she did, THEY UNDERESTIMATED TRUMP and they NEVER SAW Q COMING. I think the Satanists didn’t enjoy their Halloween in 2017.
PS: Sorry, I left out the Brian Cates link:
https://twitter.com/drawandstrike/status/1258395757872386048