Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: bagster

In drops 1318, 1704 and 2118, Q states that “If [RR] is dirty, Mueller must also be dirty. If Mueller is dirty, [RR] must also be dirty.”

He never varied his wording. He could have said “If [RR] is clean, Mueller must also be clean. If Mueller is clean, [RR] must also be clean.”

Maybe Q’s consistent choice of words is a clue? I watched Mueller give his testimony before the House Judiciary Committee and he was wobbly at best, as though he didn’t entirely share the conviction of the words he was speaking. And when given opportunities to give President Trump the benefit of the doubt, I didn’t see one occasion when he did so. The report was completed and he could have truly stuck the knife into the fake charges at that point, yet he continued to throw shade on the President. If he was playing a role, it would seem to be the one given to him by the President’s enemies.


413 posted on 05/06/2020 9:39:04 PM PDT by LittleLinda (Visible noob, 20 year invisible lurker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 362 | View Replies ]


To: LittleLinda
Bingo.


422 posted on 05/06/2020 9:54:01 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 413 | View Replies ]

To: LittleLinda

In drops 1318, 1704 and 2118, Q states that “If [RR] is dirty, Mueller must also be dirty. If Mueller is dirty, [RR] must also be dirty.”
He never varied his wording. He could have said “If [RR] is clean, Mueller must also be clean. If Mueller is clean, [RR] must also be clean.”
Maybe Q’s consistent choice of words is a clue? I watched Mueller give his testimony before the House Judiciary Committee and he was wobbly at best, as though he didn’t entirely share the conviction of the words he was speaking. And when given opportunities to give President Trump the benefit of the doubt, I didn’t see one occasion when he did so. The report was completed and he could have truly stuck the knife into the fake charges at that point, yet he continued to throw shade on the President. If he was playing a role, it would seem to be the one given to him by the President’s enemies.
**********************************************************************************
Good analysis. I am also remembering that one of Q’s replies to a question regarding good vs bad was to think in terms of leverage—who could be leveraged to play their role?

Given RR and RM backgrounds, It’s not hard to imagine that they were ripe for being leveraged.

Regardless —POTUS made good use of their Act in this movie.


449 posted on 05/06/2020 11:26:04 PM PDT by greeneyes ( Moderation In Pursuit of Justice is NO Virtue--LET FREEDOM RING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 413 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson