[W.]

Well, Chuck You, Farley, as Cheech and Chong once said...

[TigersEye]

Careful there, Schmuckey, whirlwinds sweep away anything in their path and tend to change directions frequently.

[laweeks]

How'd you like to take those eyeglasses that he wears perched on the end of his nose and SHOVE them right into his face?

[piasa]

Schumer sounded rather crazed and desperate there...

[piasa]

Something rather odd using a variant of the Biblical phrase ‘reap the whirlwind’ to defend abortion.

[Farcesensitive]

40 USC §§6134 & 6137(a)

It is unlawful to ...utter loud, threatening, or abusive language in the Supreme Court Building or grounds.

An individual who violates this ... shall be fined under title 18, imprisoned not more than 60 days, or both.

[Jacquerie]

Sixty-some million dead Americans because Scotus just can’t keep its nose out of politics.

If abortion is so great, why didn’t the rats make it legal when they concurrently controlled congress and the presidency?

[Does so]

What’s the big deal? Justices are appointed for life.

Oh...

[NewJerseyJoe]

The only thing Schumer omitted was banging his shoe on the podium. 😡

[MeneMeneTekelUpharsin]

Talking about what these people say and do has become pointless. Someone in authority needs to take action, or just drop it. Talk leads to nowhere.

[tired&retired]

Chuck is the best argument FOR abortion.

ABORT CHUCK

[TalBlack]

“I want to tell you, Gorsuch, I want to tell you, Kavanaugh, You have released the whirlwind and you will pay the price. You won’t know what hit you if you go through with these awful decisions,”

Is it just me or does this sound biblical in its phrasing? It sounds like something that would be written in red ink in the bible. Jesus Schumer...

[windowdude]

Pro-abortion/right-to-murder crowd is the most hateful ever.

[GingisK]

It might be a good idea to suspend anti-murder laws for a year or two. Freedom of choice.

[RasterMaster]

Scmuck tried to justify his remarks by saying Justice Roberts did not say anything to Trump...but trump only said that two heavily biased justices should recuse themselves. The senator’s words went FAR beyond that.

It qualifies as a legal threat...

There are three elements of the offense of making an illegal threat:

(i) there must be a transmission in interstate commerce [Schumer’s words were transmitted by video, radio, blogs].
(ii) there must be a communication containing the threat [Schumer in front of crowd with a microphone and cameras].
(iii) and the threat must be a threat to injure the person of another:

“You have released the whirlwind, and you will pay the price. You will not know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions.” -Chuck Schumer 3/4/2020

What would “you would pay the price” can a sitting senator do to a sitting Supreme Court Justice? “You will not know what hit you” IS A THREAT and “if you go forward with these awful decisions” is obstruction of justice.

Threats can also sometimes be punished under the statutes criminalizing assaulting, resisting, or impeding certain United States Government officers or employees or assassinating, kidnapping, and assaulting government officials of the United States.

When a threat is made against a judge, it can be considered obstruction of justice [18 U.S.C. § 1503].