Posted on 02/06/2020 6:47:08 AM PST by ransomnote
He'll never get enough of the black vote to make it.
See, all the callers to C-SPAN flooded their lines that "I'm a Democrat, but I'm never voting Democrat again after Nancy tearing up the speech."
If you drive away the more centrist members of your own party, you *lose*.
And people forget, often one of the advantages of a massively popular President is *coattails*.
Nancy's stunt could cost the Dems the House and Senate: and it is far more likely, the House will be filled with non-RINOs.
Hint: Full Trump Agenda. Hint: takeover of the Federal Judiciary with Constitutionalists for a generation.
I’ve been having similar thoughts.
As a Christian, I don’t want anyone to commit suicide. And I have high confidence that the Q team is Christian and/or has similar moral standards. So I am wondering if a lot of “suicides” are like Epstein - not suicides at all. Perhaps not even deaths at all.
Maybe this is the Q plan to get derps off the national stage and taken somewhere where they can be tried in court. Gitmo? Military tribunals?
Another possibility is that the derps are removing their own potential witnesses or creating distractions.
“President Trump’s character” - It’s not him I’m worried about.
“You are soft like little girl.” - Could be, I resemble that remark ;)
Look who it is. Click on it, and listen. He speaks English.
He says the entire 0moeba White Hut was trying to get rid of the Ukranian prosecutor, thus validating Q (and Glenn Beck’s latest).
” He then goes into the attempt at laying a perjury trap. In discussing Trump’s comments after his acquittal, accusing Trump of “mouthing off,” Weissmann said, “He never submitted to an interview, he never testified under oath – it’s true, the same happened in the Mueller case.” “
This is Scott Adams’ punchline:
“House Democrats have nothing to run on.”
Adams is not all wrong; his punchline:
“House Democrats have nothing to run on.”
You’re not wrong to hunger and thirst after righteousness. Not wrong to demand actual accountability for harm done to others and laws broken. But in the end, each one of us faces God. I want to face Him with the knowledge that I never rejoiced in another’s pain, no matter how evil I may have thought that person to be. And at times this is a big challenge for me, especially when I see leftists, totally consumed with so much vile hatred, rejoice and wish someone like Limbaugh a slow pain filled death.
A brilliant article on so many levels.
Remembering William T. Sherman on his 200th birthday
By Monica Showalter
FTA:
The wokester statue-pulls were really just about just going Taliban, erasing history altogether, good, bad, complex, and replacing the entire history of the Civil War with Howard Zinn-style identity-politics myths. The man who really did defeat slavery, on the military battlefront, in a deadly, disease-ridden, utterly brutal war of attrition, Sherman, gets quietly erased from memory too, not by a statue pulldown, but by ignoring him.
...
Sherman himself though wasn’t a monster at all. Several things stand out that make him sympathetic. Like Grant, he was kind of a sensitive soul, fond of painting, not something you expect in the modern age in a soldier. He was so disturbed by war early in the Civil War that he had a nervous breakdown and had to be shipped back to Ohio to recuperate. He came back, though, and fought with brilliance for the union, ruthlessly, against his own nature, because there was a higher cause at stake.
...
General Grant is a great general. I know him well. He stood by me when I was crazy, and I stood by him when he was drunk; and now, sir, we stand by each other always.
Thank you posting the whole thread. Wow
You’re not wrong to hunger and thirst after righteousness. Not wrong to demand actual accountability for harm done to others and laws broken. But in the end, each one of us faces God. I want to face Him with the knowledge that I never rejoiced in another’s pain, no matter how evil I may have thought that person to be. And at times this is a big challenge for me, especially when I see leftists, totally consumed with so much vile hatred, rejoice and wish someone like Limbaugh a slow pain filled death.
*****************************************
You’re definitely someone worth knowing in this life Dear but I’ll surly see you on the other side. For what they’ve done and continue to do, I, shamefully, want to rip and tear and ruin them. God forgive me, but I rejoice in their downfall. May God richly bless you navymon1.
:: the absolute value of The Red Pill. ::
Maybe would should start using the following:
|RedPill|
#ImWithYou
OMG! I just saw this on Twitter. How awful!
RazorFist called it the “same speech as last year” and “filled with the same accomplishments as last year” [boring].
He too feel on the same conclusion as Scott...Pelosi got her message across to the [zombies].
To some degree, they are right. The [zombies] were giggling with glee at the stunt. And a cunning stunt it was.
But, RazorFist is an avowed “Libertarian”, which means he’s a free-will socialist. He also has eye-liner tattooed on his eyes. Still, he gives a good rant. Language. YMMV
Movie buffs, regarding the coronavirus, are we “watching the movie” Contagion?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contagion_(2011_film)
>>same speech as last year
Oh, I didn’t think that at all. I was surprised by the amount of poetry in it. In general, you think of Trump as presenting in a way that makes you feel he’s talking directly to you as if you were together at a table in a restaurant. And some of what he says is what you would say, if you were really in that conversation. But this time, he ALSO spoke as SOTUs are often written, with the phrases that come down over time whether or not you noticed them as he spoke them. They’re not as effective when he speaks poetry. It’s not his natural language. But they’ll be remembered over the years because they WERE beautifully written. And we know Trump. He would NEVER have kept them in the speech unless he wanted them there. He said them for history.
AN interesting thing happened this year at the Dow Invitational (WTA).
Prior to the start of the tournament, all instances of McKinsey & Co. were removed from the inside walls and curtains. I asked is they had stopped corporate support and was told, “No. They requested their logos be taken down since the Tennis Channel was planning on broadcasting the event.”
Their name is still in/on advertising around town and on the Corporate Sponsor Board in the tennis center.
I said nothing, knowing that McKinsey has been outed by the Anons as a Clown Front and that Buttsy was one of their “graduates”.
And, it makes sense that McKinsey be there with all them furrin’ players and “coaching” staff involved.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.