Posted on 01/09/2020 12:05:31 PM PST by ransomnote
Lordy, I sure hope that is ‘disinfo’...
Ping
I have no idea what her political philosophy is, hard to discern these days. She apparently wants a wall and thinks nothing is being done; Libertarians want a “free flow of people and goods” across borders without any restrictions, they don’t like border sercurity, what to speak of walls.
Seems Ann’s basic philosophy is “What’s In It For Me”.
While we are technically in GA, the house is only 1.2 miles from the FL line. We had a 9 footer pulled out of the pond behind the house about 5 years ago. It would sun itself on the bank in the mornings. It would disappear into the pond when the cats would stalk it.
Who needs a home alarm? We're protected by Viking Kitties.
WWG1WGA
Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)
LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)
Atlanta PD Will No Longer Chase Criminals if They Flee From Cops
FTA:
As much as I abhor the lack of resolve reflected in Chief Shieldss decision, I cannot but acknowledge the logic of it. She called the judicial system in Atlanta broken, saying criminals are too often released from jail only to re-offend. I dont want to see us cost someone their life in pursuit of an auto theft person or burglar, when the courts arent even going to hold them accountable, she said. How can we justify that?
How indeed?
In enacting her no-pursuit policy, Chief Shields is merely following the latest fashion trend in law enforcement, or perhaps more aptly, non-law enforcement. It is all the rage among those social justice warriors who have wormed their way into the criminal justice woodwork to tolerate or excuse theft, drug use, and all manner of other antisocial behavior.
Oh dear, HoneysuckleTN...sorry to hear about passing of Kookie. But thanks for letting me know.
Justice Dept. winds down Clinton-related inquiry once championed by Trump. It found nothing of consequence
FTA:
John Huber, the U.S. attorney in Utah, was tapped in November 2017 by then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions to look into concerns raised by President Trump and his allies in Congress that the FBI had not fully pursued cases of possible corruption at the Clinton Foundation and during Clintons time as secretary of state, when the U.S. government decided not to block the sale of a company called Uranium One.
...
The effective conclusion of his investigation, with no criminal charges or other known impacts, is likely to roil some in the GOP who had hoped the prosecutor would vindicate their long-held suspicions about a political rival. Trump, though, has largely shifted his focus to a different federal prosecutor tapped to do a separate, special investigation: U.S. attorney in Connecticut John Durham, who Attorney General William P. Barr assigned last year to explore the origins of the FBIs 2016 probe into possible coordination between the Trump campaign and Russia.
...It was Donald Trump's fault! Just ask NBC! ...CNN!
Report: John Huber Completes Review of Clinton Foundation and Uranium One, Finds Nothing
FTA:
This would be a major disappointment for Q-decoders and Trusty Planners who claimed John Huber had hundreds of investigators spanning several states and were forecasting: (1) a suspension of Habeas Corpus, (2) military tribunals, (3) mass arrests based on over 60,000 sealed indictments; and (5) pending incarcerations at Guantanamo Bay.
As a part of his review, Huber examined documents and conferred with federal law enforcement officials in Little Rock who were handling a meandering probe into the Clinton Foundation, people familiar with the matter said. Current and former officials said that Huber has largely finished and found nothing worth pursuing though the assignment has not formally ended and no official notice has been sent to the Justice Department or to lawmakers, these people said.
One, original source is WaPo. Two, unnamed sources, some "former" officials. What kind of current and/or former officials? Doesn't say. Third - if this is true (which I seriously doubt), then Q is totally wrong on this HUGE issue.
Conclusion - wishful thinking on the part of WaPo and the like, and sadly TGP is running with it as though authentic news.
>> then Q is totally wrong on this HUGE issue
I wouldn’t make this a test of Q. Things can happen out of Q’s control and some of what Q says can be the hope that a person is good and will do good things. Q isn’t all knowing. And even if Q is wrong on this, he/they are right on enough to maintain my support.
Amazing. Lawlessness is in control in more places all the time. This is not an era to live in a city.
>> Lawlessness is in control in more places all the time. This is not an era to live in a city.
Agreed. We’re in a small conservative town, and there’s no where else I’d choose to live. Here I feel safe.
I’m not making it a test of Q; but if the WaPo is accurate (and I am about 99.999% sure it is not), it would a huge let down of the worst sort if Hitlery and the insanely huge CF crime spree involving a cast of hundreds were not to receive justice.
And I do not believe that will happen. What I find disappointing in a sense, is Sundance and Hoft running with huge stories entirely based on the garbage WaPo and anonymous sources.
>>Sundance and Hoft running with huge stories entirely based on the garbage WaPo
I think Sundance always expected this to happen, so he probably finds the news consistent to his worst fears.
That is utterly nauseating.
These people are SICK.
I gave up on Sundance a long time ago. He used to be good. Then he went eeyorey. I think because of Q envy.
Article from beyond the trees—Long paragraphs, but interesting dastardly plotting
Ghosts of Impeachment Past
http://freerepublic.com/focus/news/3807004/posts?page=1
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.