I read Osweda/Wictor’s thread unroll.
He offers a layman’s analysis, which is okay.
He’s not right.
One example, the ‘concrete’ walls with ‘fragmentation’ damage. Those walls are only kind of concrete. They’re centered with very poorly mixed cinder-blocks then covered with a stucco-like covering. I could swing my...ahem...John Thomas at the wall and knock off some plaster. The holes in the wall do not indicate a fragmentation device.
It was not a fuel-air explosive either. The condition of the bodies does not indicate that type of damage. The fact that the torso was largely intact while the legs were gone is a big cue.
I do agree that this was a different type of bomb that I haven’t seen before.
Good to know. Sorry it wasn’t more helpful.