Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BroJoeK; jeffersondem; rockrr; DoodleDawg; x

>>Joey wrote: “Kalamata claims to be a scientist, but his posts make perfectly clear he’s just the opposite, he’s anti-science.”

No, Joey. I am anti-Junk Science, such as the junk science of evolutionism.

*****************

>>Joey wrote: “Worse, he dishonestly claims that whatever Kalamata believes is science, while what he disagrees with is not.”

No, Joey. I trust science as presented by scientists when it is verifiable. I distrust junk science, such as evolutionism, because there is no evidence to support it.

*****************

>>Joey wrote: “So “science” in Kalamata’s world-view begins with the Bible and ends wherever it might be seen to conflict with Kalamata’s interpretations of Biblical text.”

Joey is always making up stories, like a good little evolutionist. That seems to be all the evolutionist knows how to do is make up just-so stories. There is certainly no evidence that supports it.

I, personally, have been a Christian for most of my life; but I was an evolutionist and an old-earther until this decade when I saw contrary evidence for the first time. When I realized the evidence pointed to a global flood, I didn’t discard it like a religious fanatic would. I followed the evidence wherever it led me. That is what scientists are (supposedly) trained to do.

*****************

>>Joey wrote: “As for “casting aspersions”, that’s what Kalamata does — it’s not just his modus operandi, it’s also his raison d’etre.”

Again, I am a counter-puncher.

*****************

>>Kalamata wrote: “The problem with know-it-alls, like Joey, is they have been name-calling for so long they don’t even realize their words are insulting. The only “insults” they hear are those thown back at them.”
>>Joey wrote: “”Know-it-all” certainly describes Kalamata, with smears, name-calling & insults his major weapons. He also brings a large repertoire of tactics for denying reality and asserting his own fantasies.”

Yeah, sure, Joey . . .

*****************

>>Kalamata wrote: “In all fairness, Kalamata’s ability to word-search whole libraries full of books & documents in order to deliver accurate quotes is beyond anything I can approach or have seen elsewhere.”

I was blessed to be able to attend five great universities, Joey.

*****************

>>Kalamata wrote: “Yes, I’ve seen him abuse quotes, for example, to make a scientist like Stephen Gould sound anti-science, but I’ve never yet seen, or caught, Kalamata faking quotes.”

Joey will not provide an example of me “making a scientist like Stephen Gould sound anti-science,” because he cannot.

Mr. Kalamata


343 posted on 01/05/2020 7:56:14 PM PST by Kalamata (BIBLE RESEARCH TOOLS: http://bibleresearchtools.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 338 | View Replies ]


To: Kalamata; jeffersondem; rockrr; DoodleDawg; x
Kalamata: "No, Joey. I am anti-Junk Science, such as the junk science of evolutionism."

Naw, you're anti-science period.
You oppose any branch or ideas of science which conflict with your own theories of "Biblical science".

Kalamata: "No, Joey.
I trust science as presented by scientists when it is verifiable.
I distrust junk science, such as evolutionism, because there is no evidence to support it."

Nonsense, you deny all science, not just evolution theory, which conflicts with your own ideas of "Biblical science".

Kalamata: "Joey is always making up stories, like a good little evolutionist.
That seems to be all the evolutionist knows how to do is make up just-so stories.
There is certainly no evidence that supports it."

Like any propagandist, rather than confess the truth, Kalamata switches over to personal attacks.

Kalamata: "I, personally, have been a Christian for most of my life; but I was an evolutionist and an old-earther until this decade when I saw contrary evidence for the first time.
When I realized the evidence pointed to a global flood, I didn’t discard it like a religious fanatic would.
I followed the evidence wherever it led me.
That is what scientists are (supposedly) trained to do."

Naw, you deliberately followed fake evidence which lead you to a predetermined conclusion, "Biblical science".

Kalamata: "Again, I am a counter-puncher."

Naw, you don't wait to "counter-punch", you're in there with personal attacks & smears whenever things get even a little... dicey for you.

Kalamata: "I was blessed to be able to attend five great universities, Joey."

I am impressed with your research skills, but not your honesty or reasoning ability.

Kalamata: "Joey will not provide an example of me “making a scientist like Stephen Gould sound anti-science,” because he cannot."

You've posted any number of quotes from Gould and used them to argue your own anti-science opinions.

351 posted on 01/06/2020 4:15:36 AM PST by BroJoeK ((a little historical perspective...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 343 | View Replies ]

To: Kalamata
No, Joey. I trust science as presented by scientists when it is verifiable. I distrust junk science, such as evolutionism, because there is no evidence to support it.

OK so you don't trust Geology, Physics, Zoology, Biology, Meteorology, Astronomy, Botany, Anthropology, Archeology, or Paleontology. Perhaps an easier question might be what scientific disciplines do you trust?

359 posted on 01/06/2020 6:10:20 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 343 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson