Kalamata:
"No, Joey. I am anti-Junk Science, such as the junk science of evolutionism." Naw, you're anti-science period.
You oppose any branch or ideas of science which conflict with your own theories of "Biblical science".
Kalamata: "No, Joey.
I trust science as presented by scientists when it is verifiable.
I distrust junk science, such as evolutionism, because there is no evidence to support it."
Nonsense, you deny all science, not just evolution theory, which conflicts with your own ideas of "Biblical science".
Kalamata: "Joey is always making up stories, like a good little evolutionist.
That seems to be all the evolutionist knows how to do is make up just-so stories.
There is certainly no evidence that supports it."
Like any propagandist, rather than confess the truth, Kalamata switches over to personal attacks.
Kalamata: "I, personally, have been a Christian for most of my life; but I was an evolutionist and an old-earther until this decade when I saw contrary evidence for the first time.
When I realized the evidence pointed to a global flood, I didn’t discard it like a religious fanatic would.
I followed the evidence wherever it led me.
That is what scientists are (supposedly) trained to do."
Naw, you deliberately followed fake evidence which lead you to a predetermined conclusion, "Biblical science".
Kalamata: "Again, I am a counter-puncher."
Naw, you don't wait to "counter-punch", you're in there with personal attacks & smears whenever things get even a little... dicey for you.
Kalamata: "I was blessed to be able to attend five great universities, Joey."
I am impressed with your research skills, but not your honesty or reasoning ability.
Kalamata: "Joey will not provide an example of me “making a scientist like Stephen Gould sound anti-science,” because he cannot."
You've posted any number of quotes from Gould and used them to argue your own anti-science opinions. ![]()
>>Kalamata wrote: "No, Joey. I am anti-Junk Science, such as the junk science of evolutionism."
>>Joey wrote: "Naw, you're anti-science period. You oppose any branch or ideas of science which conflict with your own theories of "Biblical science"."
Don't let Joey fool you: evolution is his religion, On the Origin of Species is his holy book, and Darwin is his prophet.
*****************
>>Kalamata wrote: "No, Joey. I trust science as presented by scientists when it is verifiable. I distrust junk science, such as evolutionism, because there is no evidence to support it."
>>Joey wrote: "Nonsense, you deny all science, not just evolution theory, which conflicts with your own ideas of "Biblical science"."
I asked Joey for evidence of evolution, and all he could deliver were highly-imaginative museum mockups based on highly-fragmented fossils. The ENCODE Project Report of 2012 exposed the myth of Junk DNA that the evolutionist so heavily relied upon, so they are now desperately trying to keep the evolution myth alive.
Scientists know there is no empirical evidence for evolution -- none; and more and more scientists are speaking out, despite a credible threat to their careers by the modern-day Inquisition of the evolutionism orthodoxy.
*****************
>>Kalamata wrote: "Joey is always making up stories, like a good little evolutionist. That seems to be all the evolutionist knows how to do is make up just-so stories. There is certainly no evidence that supports it."
>>Joey wrote: "Like any propagandist, rather than confess the truth, Kalamata switches over to personal attacks."
Child.
*****************
>>Kalamata wrote: "I, personally, have been a Christian for most of my life; but I was an evolutionist and an old-earther until this decade when I saw contrary evidence for the first time. When I realized the evidence pointed to a global flood, I didn’t discard it like a religious fanatic would. I followed the evidence wherever it led me. That is what scientists are (supposedly) trained to do."
>>Joey wrote: "Naw, you deliberately followed fake evidence which lead you to a predetermined conclusion, "Biblical science"."
The geological column is not fake evidence, Joey. It is there for all to see, world-wide. The evidence within the column for a global flood is multi-fold:
1) The column is composed of thick, homogeneous, sedimentary rock layers.
2) The rock layers are found world-wide and sometimes cross continents and oceans.
3) There is limited bioturbation within the layers.
4) There is limited erosion between the layers, even adjacent to a missing layer.
5) Fossil species exhibit abrupt appearance, followed by stasis
6) Fossil species demonstrate disparity before diversity.
All of those characteristics contradict the theory of evolution. Worse for the theory, all of the major animal Phyla showed up in the earliest sedimentary rock layers, called the Cambrian. That is what you would expect in a flood, but not in a gradual evolution of life.
This is world-famous evolutionary paleontologist, James Valentine, trying to explain the abrupt appearance of the Phyla:
On the Origin of Phyla - Interviews with Dr. James Valentine
*****************
>>Kalamata wrote: "Again, I am a counter-puncher."
>>Joey wrote: "Naw, you don't wait to "counter-punch", you're in there with personal attacks & smears whenever things get even a little... dicey for you."
Again, I am a counter-puncher. If you have contrary evidence, please present it.
*****************
>>Kalamata wrote: "I was blessed to be able to attend five great universities, Joey."
>>Joey wrote: "I am impressed with your research skills, but not your honesty or reasoning ability."
Joey reminds me of the proverbial "children in the marketplace."
*****************
Kalamata wrote: "Joey will not provide an example of me “making a scientist like Stephen Gould sound anti-science,” because he cannot."
>>Joey wrote: "You've posted any number of quotes from Gould and used them to argue your own anti-science opinions."
I know you cannot provide any examples, Child. For the rest of you, these are the kinds of scientific quotes from devout evolutionists that outrage (and scare the daylights out of) the evolutionism ideologues:
"The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as the trade secret of paleontology. The evolutionary trees that adorn our textbooks have data only at the tips and nodes of their branches; the rest is inference, however reasonable, not the evidence of fossils. Yet Darwin was so wedded to gradualism that he wagered his entire theory on a denial of this literal record:
"[Quoting Darwin] The geological record is extremely imperfect and this fact will to a large extent explain why we do not find interminable varieties, connecting together all the extinct and existing forms of life by the finest graduated steps. He who rejects these views on the nature of the geological record, will rightly reject my whole theory."
"[Gould, again] Darwin's argument still persists as the favored escape of most paleontologists from the embarrassment of a record that seems to show so little of evolution directly. In exposing its cultural and methodological roots, I wish in no way to impugn the potential validity of gradualism (for all general views have similar roots). I wish only to point out that it was never "seen" in the rocks."
[The Episodic Nature of Evolutionary Change (Reprinted from Natural History 86:5, 'Evolution's Erratic Pace', May 1977, p.14), in Stephen Jay Gould, "The Panda's Thumb." W. W. Norton & Company, 1980, Chap.17, p.181]
You see, according to the evolutionism ideologues, scientists are supposed to be evolutionists FIRST! Gould had a tendency to be a scientist first, as did Dr. James Valentine (linked above). Just sayin' . . .
Mr. Kalamata