I’ve been chewing on what was posted upthread about the Turtle dismissing the impeachment upon introduction.
I see brilliance there. If that happens, it will assure me that Q Team is several moves ahead.
1. If there is a trial, and the Senate calls witnesses (like some here want) like the bite-me’s, corney, mueller, etc. etc. WHEN the indictments are unsealed the left will cry ‘foul’ - retribution for the impeachment testimonies.
2. If the impeachment ‘trial’ really doesn’t even get addressed in the Senate, THEN WHEN the indictments start getting unsealed, the American public can be told by the authorities that “these are criminal cases built on criminal investigations” rather than the left screaming “payback for impeachment!”.
Makes sense to me, and once again hogties the cabal. They’re being led down a path to destruction by Q and the TRUTH. And there aren’t many exits left for them.
Outside of red scarves, doorknobs, and the hangman’s noose.
Interesting theory. Could be. I still tend to think there will be a trial in the Senate. Not sure what to make of the report of McConnell saying he will dismiss. That contradicts earlier statements he’s made. Q just posted the following, which seems to imply that the plan is to introduce evidence in a Senate trial as a way to prep the populace for the coming indictments.
Q 3702
The Senate must be unrestricted to conduct ‘other’ important business.
If [D]s knew Senate would not vote to convict - why proceed?
How long does a typical Senate impeachment trial take?
Can the Senate conduct ‘other’ business during this time?
No.
What ‘value’ might this have for [D]s?
Barr/Durham working in secret?
Senate working openly?
‘Value’ of public learning the truth prior to i_unseal?
Propaganda_push failing.
Transparency & Accountability is the only way forward to save the Republic.
This is not another 4-year election.
Game theory.
Q
Your thoughts seem reasonable. Trail would screw up judicial appointments as well.