Interesting theory. Could be. I still tend to think there will be a trial in the Senate. Not sure what to make of the report of McConnell saying he will dismiss. That contradicts earlier statements he’s made. Q just posted the following, which seems to imply that the plan is to introduce evidence in a Senate trial as a way to prep the populace for the coming indictments.
Q 3702
The Senate must be unrestricted to conduct ‘other’ important business.
If [D]s knew Senate would not vote to convict - why proceed?
How long does a typical Senate impeachment trial take?
Can the Senate conduct ‘other’ business during this time?
No.
What ‘value’ might this have for [D]s?
Barr/Durham working in secret?
Senate working openly?
‘Value’ of public learning the truth prior to i_unseal?
Propaganda_push failing.
Transparency & Accountability is the only way forward to save the Republic.
This is not another 4-year election.
Game theory.
Q
:: the plan is to introduce evidence in a Senate trial ::
But, it needn’t be THIS upcoming trial.
Personally, I’d love to see Tut-Tut Tuttle review the articles, and go all /District Attorney/ abusing a crooked cop, “There’s no crime here! Take this sh*t back and bring me a REAL crime. Then we’ll talk trial. Go do your effing job and stop wasting my time!”
(Sorry, I could help that last one...)