I have verified it myself on the link https://www.justice.gov/storage/120919-examination.pdf.
Search for "Comey" -- 0 hits.
Search for "Corney" -- 149 hits.
This is horse crap.
I have verified it myself on the link https://www.justice.gov/storage/120919-examination.pdf.
Search for "Comey" -- 0 hits.
Search for "Corney" -- 149 hits.
This is horse crap.
Somebody is sending a signal.
Is it the white hats or the black hats???
Q sent us a post back in March where this same issue occurs. Check on the second link to the document Q posted here.
2943
When Will Americans Wake up to the [D] Party Con?
Q
!!mG7VJxZNCI
3 Mar 2019 - 5:17:55 PM
https://twitter.com/tedlieu/status/1102265163107971077 #128193;
More statements made (evidence) without presenting facts.
If ‘evidence’ exists(ed), under ‘broad’ scope #1, would Mueller have the auth to pursue?
https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/967231/download #128193;
The Special Counsel is authorized to conduct the investigation confinned by then-FBI Director James 8. Corney in testimony before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence on March 20, 2017, including:
(i) any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump; and
(ii) any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation; and
(iii) any other matters within the scope of 28 C.F.R. § 600.4(a).
Because no evidence exists(ed) and/or was found by SC/Mueller, was scope #2 enacted in an attempt to go outside of the ‘intended engagement’?
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4429989-Rod-Rosenstein-memo-outlining-scope-of-Mueller.html #128193;
Why is scope #2 classified only to AG/DAG and a select few others (read at terminal only)?
If ‘evidence’ exists(ed), why did R+D members of the Senate conclude NO DIRECT EVIDENCE EXISTS …………..?
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/senate-has-uncovered-no-direct-evidence-conspiracy-between-trump-campaign-n970536 #128193;
If ‘evidence’ exists(ed), as per your statement released today, again, why did the SENATE (R’s + D’s) JUST CONCLUDE NO EVIDENCE EXISTS?
When will Americans wake up to the [D] party con that is continually pushed without facts, without support, and supported and further pushed by the media arm of the [D] party [FAKE NEWS MEDIA]?
Reading the comments on these Tweets further demonstrates the seriousness of media brainwashing in our Country whereby statements are considered fact w/o the need to provide proof.
Group-Think.
Control of the Narrative.
If enough people state the same thing w/o providing evidence and/or support does it become FACTUAL to those caught in the loop?
NATIONAL CRISIS.
Q
Yep. I did the same exact thing earlier. I was talking to my son about this. All of government uses word when creating documents. Do any of these idiots not see the little squiggly red lines under that name 149 times when they proofread the document? This is incomprehensible.