Posted on 12/09/2019 9:43:41 AM PST by ransomnote
Extra info on Cass Sunstein:
He wrote a book called “Nudge”.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nudge_(book)
IMO, it was a rationalization of why government propaganda is good. Because it’s for your own good. Because people like CS are so much smarter than you that they should decide how you should live your life and they should nudge you into those “correct” decisions about your life.
Interesting note: I went to Amazon and tried to look at the one star reviews and Amazon claimed there weren’t any!! Despite the graph showing 5% were one star. So then I went to the 2 star review and I STRONGLY suspect Amazon has filtered them. Nearly all of the 2 star reviews said the book was boring. Really? No one questioned the propaganda premise of this book???
/slide
Your “exposed” list is quite definitive.....and thorough.....kudos.
I'd believe an OCR error. But not when it happens that 100% of every mention in the entire document was misread.
100%.
No other "m" letters mis-read by OCR. Fancy that.
I don't understand the message, but there's a message.
Corney and Comey look alike in many fonts.
Does this explain the corn field posts? Who harvested the documents?
Do a search for "rn" and "m" and let us know what you find.
My guess is you'll find all the "rn" and "m" without autocorrections.
qv my post a couple up from this one.
nite
nite
I wish I had an answer.
All I know is there is *something* there. For me to guess what it is would be throwing darts.
What a movie!
JOHN SOLOMON’S PAINT BY NUMBERS:
51 VIOLATIONS OF WOODS PROCEDURES
9 FALSE STATEMENTS
9 INAACCURATE STATEMENTS
33 STATEMENTS WITHOUT VERIFICATION OR EVIDENCE TO SUPP
4 INFORMANTS TARGETED AT THE
1 GIANT CONSPIRACY TO CONTINUE TO SURVEIL THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN
Tom Fitton was Right, early and often, in assessment of this IG Report.
Quote above was, by Lou DOBBS.
Fitton said for weeks if not months the Report was part expose and Cover Up.
Judicial Watch has done the work of the Justice Department, the stinking State Department and the FBI, and Breaking with news all along the way.
They Know these guys!
Ill be following Tom and the Boys at JW much more closely for reading the Facts and divining developments from now on.
Ive seen all the discussion about OCR. I work with people who do OCR on a large scale. The issue seems to be with the search more so than the data returned by OCR.
But Im open to any possibility.
Dec. 9, 2019 is a day that will be remembered in the annals of our FreeQ History forever. Maybe all of history too.
drawandstrike on twitter calls it Horowitzmas.
I hope he’s right...
Here it is:
(see post 33 this thread.)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The executive summary is a MUST read!!! Remember...Horowitiz is not the prosecutor, He is the driver. Durham will use the details of how the deep state used parsing, and the rules, to circumvent those rules, to justify the Operation Hurricane to SPY. Use what you know when you read the Executive Summary. Our legal FreeQ’s can explain better than this old dog.
ThankQ M. Thatcher for posting the link. So important!
MQD ThankQ for keeping me on you ping list.
TEXOKIE ThankQ for keeping the door open to the Quanteen, though I’m still two days behind on the last thread... I really enjoy the beanbag you kindly left out for me.
Bagster - Would you mind throwing another log on the fire? These old bone always enjoy the heat you provide. KEK
ThankQ all to every FREEQ and Freerepubic (Thanks Jim. Together, we will break the chains that we have allowed to bind us by being; so quiet, so polite, and so proper.)
Note I have added a to my tagline.
On Page 186, it talks about the FBI identifying and interviewing the primary sub-source for the Steele dossier. (Christopher Steele had a primary sub-source, and this person had other people reporting to him and that formed the basis of the dossier.)
What did the FBI find in January of 2017? That once they identified the sub-source and actually interviewed the sub-source the sub-source says the primary sub-source told that FBI that he/she had not seen Steele's report until that it became public that month and that he/she made statements indicating that Steele misstated or exaggerated the primary sub-source statements in multiple sections of the reporting. The primary sub-source told the FBI that basically this was rumor and speculation, hearsay/bar-talk,and he never believed that Steele would use the information provided in any official document. That should have been a red light for the Department of Justice and the FBI.
Ladies and Gentlemen in January, 2015 and thereafter, the primary sub-source of the Steele dossier is telling the FBI and the Department of Justice that the Russian dossier is not reliable. That is was never meant to be used as an official document, it's all hearsay, rumor/bar-talk and he specifically talks about the episode involving President Trump and sexual activity inside of Russia and says that was all rumor and speculation, word-of-mouth and hearsay. So, what should have happened? Once the FBI and Department of Justice was told by the primary sub-source that the document was not reliable, they had a duty, in my [Senator Graham's] view to report to the FISA court exculpatory information. Not only did they not tell the court that the sub-source trashed out their document, this what they told the court, on page 190.
Carter Page's renewal applications (#2 and 3) advised the court that following the January interview with the primary sub-source, the FBI found the Russian-based sub-source to be truthful and cooperative. That's a lie! The sub-source said exactly the opposite! So not only did they continue to get a warrant against Mr. Page after being told by the primary source of the document that it's all garbage/hearsay/bar-talk/not reliable, they got two more warrants using that document and they described to the court the interview in January, found that the Russian-based sub-source to be truthful and cooperative.
I don't know who told the court that; I don't know who was in the meeting in January, February, but I want to find out who these people are and they need to be held accountable, because what they did from that point on, this whole endeavor became a criminal conspiracy to defraud the court, to trample on the rights of an American citizen, Mr. Carter Page and continue an operation against the President of the United States that I think is unwarranted. I cannot stress enough that all of us rely upon those with the powers to follow us, surveil us, and to check on us, to be honest and truthful. Nobody has mentioned a word about this yet, that on page 186 to 190 in the Horowitz report, it describes in great detail how the FBI found out that the sub-source of the Steele dossier disavowed it and they used it two more times to get warrants. They never told the court, and they actually lied to the court about the interview.
If that doesn't bother you, you hate Trump way too much. That should bother every American and it gets worse.
In June of 2017, one of the lawyers in the FBI, who's supposed to review warrants (Clinesmith) is told by the CIA that Carter Page is a source. What does he tell the FISA court? That he is NOT a source. He took the information supplied to him by the FBI and doctored a email so the court would not be aware of the fact that Carter Page was a source for the CIA. Why is that important?
In building a case against Carter Page they used the dossier. They tried to get a warrant in August and they couldn't. Somebody thought of the great idea of beginning to use the dossier to get a warrant, and it apparently worked. But here's the problem: Three people named in the dossier as having talked to Carter Page, believed to be foreign agents. Carter Page, while being wired, unknown to him, said, "I don't know these two people." And to this day, there's no proof that he met the two people he denies meeting and that was one of the reasons they classified him as a foreign agent. The third contact was with a person known to be a foreign agent and he told the CIA about the contact because he was their source. Why is it important that they lied to the court? If the court had known that he had a reason to be talking to this person, it would have been completely different. That's why Mr. Clinesmith lied, because if that fact ever got confirmed, it would change the entire predicate they set up to the court, as to whether or not Carter Page was a foreign agent. You cannot surveil somebody unless you have proof they are a foreign agent.
WOODS is a bust! Its totally inadequate and no one overseeing the WOODS department gave a rip, as the transcript revealed of the WOODS gal investigated. She withheld and needed her teeth pulled out. They got Nothing from her after 120 pages of reading, I gave up.
As Butch Cassidy said, WHO ARE these guys?!
good catch:
To report allegations of waste, fraud, abuse, or misconduct regarding DOJ
programs, employees, contractors, grants, or contracts please visit or call the
DOJ OIG Hotline at oiq.justice.qov/hotline or (800) 869-4499.
The g s
change to q s
when you cut and paste them
What a SHOW!
I was rock solid Hillary for a long time. Almost right after the election.
I just knew she was gonna let the 22 take each other out and she walks out of the tunnel slimmer with a facelift having spent no campaign money.
She never lost weight, she went on that crap world tour with her husband and couldn’t sell seats. She still had coughing jags...
So I got off her.
Now? Rat candidates are like the keystone cops.
Ain’t no one else. DNC is again broke and Hillary is mostly flush.
She can go 30 days to a fat farm and no one would miss her. A little tweak here, a little tweak there, new wardrobe and she loses 10 years in age. (not sure how those ankles go away).
So yeah... Now...I’m back on her (that sounded funny)... another listening tour, a phony “draft” movement and ...she is it.
ThankQ!
That pushes LG back into the white hat (or at least red hat) column. IMO, It calls into question everything that BDA has said.
Didn’t work for me.
Did they change it? Or am I looking at the wrong page or something?
I tried copy/pasting “To report allegations .....-4499” and a few other places, too.
Observation: I’m seeing lots of Assange in the Twitterverse.
Maybe there’s about to be news about him?
Appearing to be purposeful.
com and corn look pretty close to me too.
Hiding it in plain sight. Never thought we would see/notice it?
If DN and CG had not had tractors and corn crops would we have those most important corn crumb clues?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.