See link: for way better formatting, missing graphics and even an audio version.
7
It’s not the Bill of Needs.
I don’t have an AR-15; I have a Ruger 556. Saying AR-15 is like saying you have a car.
“flooding, which is my field”
Then you should know better!
> There’s the “you can’t fight the army with small arms” bucket,
Were it not practically illegal to get larger arms, that assertion would be moot.
I must take issue with the notion that the Civil War was an effort to overthrow the US government. It was an effort of several states to secede from the union.
He completely left out Islam.
Islam has been a “religion” of conquest and slavery, murder and mayhem since its founding by Mad Mo.
Stupidly, we have allowed millions to come here and colonize our country.
When they have sufficient numbers they take over, look around the world.
So that’s another canary in the coal mine for the tin foil hat right winger — you have a class of people who are vehemently demanding confiscation of rifles in the public sphere, while some of them are secretly building underground fortresses in the private sphere.
This is why it is very important to list out the times when the commies have demanded gun confiscation
They try to pretend this is all a conspiracy theory when they have been demanding this all along.
The left has called for gun confiscation over 75 times – Beto version 2019 https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3797787/posts
I don’t need a complicated mathematical equation. Just simple logic.
If a tyranny never happens:
a) the guy who bought a combat rifle perhaps just has an expensive toy
b) the guy who didn’t buy one has a few extra bucks in his pocket
If a tyranny happens:
a) the guy who bought a combat rifle has a fighting chance to regain his freedom
b) the guy who didn’t buy one is either dead or a slave
of all the prepping i have done and considered, getting eye surgery to eliminate the need for glasses never entered my mind.
Nice find. Thanks for posting.
bkmrk
