Ladies and gentleman, I give you a specimen. This specimen is a Q denier who theorizes that the Q program may be a derp state program intended to PRETEND to be a white hat program with the intention of making us good patriots stare in a hypnotic trance and cease all activity in the furtherance of MAGA.

A very strange theory, considering the level of information that the Q program has released and/or identified.

Here is his latest attempt to put forward that particular conspiracy theory. Now remember, believing Q is either a white hat or a black hat psyop are equally so-called 'conspiracy theories'. Just different. Two sides of the same coin, so to speak. So the Tater does actually 'believe' in Q, but he just 'he' is working toward different goals.

Me: "Why would the derps tell on themselves?" (latest Q proof).

Tater: Why not? The fact that FBI agents have been falsifying evidence and lying in their 302 write ups has been out in the public domain for a long time. And you have to admit, releasing this little tidbit does make Q look good to his fans. Maybe even good enough to shutdown any talk that "he" is actually a controlled opposition project being run by the derps.

Why not? Why WOULDN'T the derp state 'tell on itself'. Well, I can think of several reasons but just off the top of my head, try this. The so-called 'deep state' has spent oh, probably hundreds of years CONCEALING there activtities, that being essential to the successful completion of their objectives. So you could say that secrecy is inherent in their operations.

If the general public of humanity knew how they had been lied to, used, indoctrinated, enclaved, killed, etc; chances are they might object. Do you agree?

So all of a sudden they're going to reveal themselves and their methods and activities? And name names? Really, Garth? This is your theory?

You don't seem stupid, but that is the by god stupidest theory I think I've ever heard. If I were you, I'd stick with 'Q is a LARP'.

Also, think about this. You people continually claim that, as things come out publicly just as Q said they would, 'everybody already knew that' or 'it was in the public domain'. Question. For a lot of that, how do you think it got into the public domain?

I don't think you have any inkling of what Q is all about. Were I a member of the Q team, part of my plan would be to 'leak' things into the public domain. Do you need a step by step on how they might do that? Or can you connect ANY dots at all?

Anyway, Garth. My Mexican food came and I gotta eat it. Welcome. I notice you again didn't come to 'criticize' the Q information, but rather the very foundation of the Q program, which I told you this thread is not about.

So don't be surprised if people are 'mean' to you. At least you can run off beyond the trees and complain about howthe bullies took your lunch money. Again.

Other than that, I know you got rick rolled again but you'll never admit it, so don't bother lying.

p.s. Calling us 'Q fans' is insulting. You might not know that, but I suspect you do. So please don't play the innocent lamb just seeking honest discussion. That B.S. don't play.

#NoVictimCard

#RawCrowFeathersAndAll

#HopeYoureHongry

🤪

"Other than that, I know you got rick rolled again but you'll never admit it, so don't bother lying."

Ha! I knew that was a rick-roll! I may not be smart enough to appreciate the brilliance of an anonymous poster on the internet but I am still smart enough to never, ever open another link from you. But, on to more serious matters.

"This specimen is a Q denier who theorizes that the Q program may be a derp state program intended to PRETEND to be a white hat program with the intention of making us good patriots stare in a hypnotic trance and cease all activity in the furtherance of MAGA."

I hypothesize more than just that Bagster, I wonder whether Q may also have been created for two other purposes for which false leaders are often used.

1. Turning the herd at critical moments.

2. Blackwashing the entire movement.

"Why WOULDN'T the derp state 'tell on itself'. Well, I can think of several reasons but just off the top of my head, try this. The so-called 'deep state' has spent oh, probably hundreds of years CONCEALING there activtities, that being essential to the successful completion of their objectives."

Obviously Bagster, you don't understand the difficulties involved in enslaving the entire human race. One of the two biggest mistakes our would-be rulers made in the execution of their plan was not seeing the importance of the internet in allowing us to share information and educate ourselves, and each other, outside of their controlled information and education silos.

If they had seen the danger the internet posed to the secrecy of their plan they never would have allowed us to post anonymously. If we had to have our real identities attached to everything we said online right from the beginning days of the internet they could have used their control of our employment to force our silence. Providing advancement to suck ups and refusing the same to people whose minds lead them down unapproved paths is at the base of the control structure they have built.

But they missed that one and we've had thirty years now of being able to search out the truth. You'll never find it if you just take what's given to you (new Q drop! new Q drop!) but if you go looking far and wide eventually things start coming together for you - and as long as you are self directed you don't have to worry about a leader leading you astray.

"Also, think about this. You people continually claim that, as things come out publicly just as Q said they would, 'everybody already knew that' or 'it was in the public domain'. Question. For a lot of that, how do you think it got into the public domain?"

Mae Brussell and Bill Cooper anyone? Yeah, there's a bit of crazy in those two but there's a lot of truth in what they had to say too. Or how about that book I keep touting here on Free Republic Bagster. You know, the one by one of the 20th century's preeminent historians, Professor Carroll Quigley. The book that is also free for download on archive.org. And, would you believe it? This book is written in clear, concise English (as opposed to who?) and documents very well who is enslaving the world and how they are doing it.

Control in Private Hands Able to Dominate Every Nation on Earth

"In addition to these pragmatic goals, the powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences. The apex of the system was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basle, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world's central banks which were themselves private corporations. Each central bank, in the hands of men like Montagu Norman of the Bank of England, Benjamin Strong of the New York Federal Reserve Bank, Charles Rist of the Bank of France, and Hjalmar Schacht of the Reichsbank, sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world."

- Carroll Quigley in his book Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time

Another quote from Tragedy and Hope:

"The substantive financial powers of the world were in the hands of these investment bankers (also called 'international' or 'merchant' bankers) who remained largely behind the scenes in their own unincorporated private banks. These formed a system of international cooperation and national dominance which was more private, more powerful, and more secret than that of their agents in the central banks. this dominance of investment bankers was based on their control over the flows of credit and investment funds in their own countries and throughout the world. They could dominate the financial and industrial systems of their own countries by their influence over the flow of current funds though bank loans, the discount rate, and the re-discounting of commercial debts; they could dominate governments by their own control over current government loans and the play of the international exchanges."

Or maybe an 86 year old quote from one of our Presidents:

"The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the large centers has owned the Government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson."

- President Franklin Delano Roosevelt
November 23, 1933, in a letter to Colonel Edward Mandell House

You know Bagster, just because you weren't paying attention didn't mean school wasn't in session. My eyes were opened in 1986 when I caught the Wall Street Journal lying to me about the Simpson-Mazzoli Immigration Act and I've spent the years since then educating myself and hanging out with others of like mind.

How long has the Q phenomenon been going on now? Two years? Mae Brussell was on late night radio back in 1971 naming names and laying out exactly what was being done to us. Her radio broadcasts are still available online and people have been talking about what she had to say for almost fifty years now. Q's not telling you much in the way of new information Bagster, he's just telling you things that you didn't know. And he's got you hooked up good and tight too, doesn't he? Sure hope he doesn't lead you down the wrong path when the coming storm finally hits us all.

"You don't seem stupid, but that is the by god stupidest theory I think I've ever heard. If I were you, I'd stick with 'Q is a LARP'."

Gee, how sweet. And this after you told me yesterday that I had a pretty good handle on what is going on behind the scenes. Quote:

"All of what you posted and then some is, I would say, as close to the truth as you can get without being in the room during the meetings."

Of course you also called me a germ and an edible root in that conversation so maybe I should take that compliment with a grain of salt.

Speaking of what you said yesterday, do you remember when you told me that almost half of Q's posts have to do with who is running things behind the scenes and that you lied to that normie because the normies aren't ready to handle the truth but by golly I should come to the Q forum (yes folks, I was invited here by Bagster) because people in here knew all about who's actually running this world? Then why today, when PeteyPupperDoo in post #702 asked,

"But who is/are the puppeteer/puppeteers???"

Only Conservative Gato responded, and that cat said, quote:

"Good question, just more to be determined."

No one else stepped up to answer the most important question that needs to be answered EVERY time it is asked. It's almost like they don't know and after 2 years of Q's enlightenment I find it strange that they don't.

It's almost like that answer is being hidden.