Ladies and gentleman, I give you a specimen. This specimen is a Q denier who theorizes that the Q program may be a derp state program intended to PRETEND to be a white hat program with the intention of making us good patriots stare in a hypnotic trance and cease all activity in the furtherance of MAGA.

A very strange theory, considering the level of information that the Q program has released and/or identified.

Here is his latest attempt to put forward that particular conspiracy theory. Now remember, believing Q is either a white hat or a black hat psyop are equally so-called 'conspiracy theories'. Just different. Two sides of the same coin, so to speak. So the Tater does actually 'believe' in Q, but he just 'he' is working toward different goals.

Me: "Why would the derps tell on themselves?" (latest Q proof).

Tater: Why not? The fact that FBI agents have been falsifying evidence and lying in their 302 write ups has been out in the public domain for a long time. And you have to admit, releasing this little tidbit does make Q look good to his fans. Maybe even good enough to shutdown any talk that "he" is actually a controlled opposition project being run by the derps.

Why not? Why WOULDN'T the derp state 'tell on itself'. Well, I can think of several reasons but just off the top of my head, try this. The so-called 'deep state' has spent oh, probably hundreds of years CONCEALING there activtities, that being essential to the successful completion of their objectives. So you could say that secrecy is inherent in their operations.

If the general public of humanity knew how they had been lied to, used, indoctrinated, enclaved, killed, etc; chances are they might object. Do you agree?

So all of a sudden they're going to reveal themselves and their methods and activities? And name names? Really, Garth? This is your theory?

You don't seem stupid, but that is the by god stupidest theory I think I've ever heard. If I were you, I'd stick with 'Q is a LARP'.

Also, think about this. You people continually claim that, as things come out publicly just as Q said they would, 'everybody already knew that' or 'it was in the public domain'. Question. For a lot of that, how do you think it got into the public domain?

I don't think you have any inkling of what Q is all about. Were I a member of the Q team, part of my plan would be to 'leak' things into the public domain. Do you need a step by step on how they might do that? Or can you connect ANY dots at all?

Anyway, Garth. My Mexican food came and I gotta eat it. Welcome. I notice you again didn't come to 'criticize' the Q information, but rather the very foundation of the Q program, which I told you this thread is not about.

So don't be surprised if people are 'mean' to you. At least you can run off beyond the trees and complain about howthe bullies took your lunch money. Again.

Other than that, I know you got rick rolled again but you'll never admit it, so don't bother lying.

p.s. Calling us 'Q fans' is insulting. You might not know that, but I suspect you do. So please don't play the innocent lamb just seeking honest discussion. That B.S. don't play.

#NoVictimCard

#RawCrowFeathersAndAll

#HopeYoureHongry

🤪