That sounds exactly what Q has said OVER AND OVER. Your misunderstanding and ignorance of Q is astounding. And yet you have an opinion.
Friggin Amazing.
Hey - I was just looking for what you know - not your opinion. I mean, after all, you do post as if you know.
If Q turns out to be a white hat, will you be fan then?
What do you know that I don’t?
Do you think I am a fan?
You’ve been Bagstered
reminds me of this headline about Elton John
https://www.magzter.com/US/American-Media,-Inc./National-Enquirer/Celebrity/159793
>>I am still undecided as to whether he is a white hat or a black hat and think that the question of whether or not Q is a controlled-opposition project is worthy of discussion.
I am probably the most pro-Q person you could find, and I completely agree with that statement. Q is like Shroedinger’s cat. We don’t know if it’s dead or alive until we open the box. I prefer to think it’s alive. With the cat the odds are 50/50. I think the odds for Q are extremely high.
I would be MORE THAN HAPPY to discuss Q = black hat via PM. But to come on this board and try to argue that Q = BH is like going into a church and trying to argue that there is no God. (No, I’m NOT equating Q with God.) It’s not appropriate. It’s not polite. Someone who goes into church and asks honest questions is welcome. Someone who goes into church and tries to disrupt is not.
This is the only place we have to discuss and support each other and it becomes tedious when we are constantly having to defend ourselves. So instead of disrupting, how about “chatting over a nice cup of coffee after church”? You have an open invitation to chat, argue, trade ideas, debate or whatever you like via PM. I won’t try to convert you unless that is what you’re looking for. Just open discussion. I would bet others on this thread might be willing to engage via PM as well.
Sincerely,
g