There is a theory that wearing purple indicates submission. So anyone who shows up very publicly in purple is saying they are now controlled by Trump/Q and also protected by Trump/Q. No longer controlled by the Cabal, but in danger from the Cabal. If they cross Trump/Q, they are cut loose and probably will be taken out by the Cabal.
https://www.gq.com/story/erik-prince-purple-revolution-spy-network-conspiracy
But there’s more. The Intercept reported that Prince’s partner in the venture, a former CIA officer, has been making some mighty wild claims: That White House national-security adviser H.R. McMaster has ordered surveillance of Trump’s family and of Steve Bannon, and that McMaster has “used a burner phone to send information gathered through the surveillance to a facility in Cyprus owned by George Soros.”
Covert surveillance of the president’s family? Burner phones? Secret island facilities financed by liberal billionaires? The claims sound so farfetched that it’s hard to believe they were made by a CIA veteran working hand in hand with Prince, a close ally of Trump’s who spent part of election night with the future president. Nevertheless, theories that once would have been dismissed outright in polite society are being taken very seriously among many of the people close to power in Trump’s Washington.
Prince himself recently endorsed a separate jaw-dropping theory about Soros: He suspects the magnate of trying to orchestrate an effort to sabotage the Trump administration through a so-called “Purple Revolution.” This campaign of resistance was purported to have begun in the moments right after the election, spurred along—supposedly—by Hillary Clinton and her husband, who each wore purple on stage as Clinton offered her concession speech in November 2016.
Prince’s suspicions about a “Purple Revolution” offer a window into his worldview and those of his fellow travelers, self-proclaimed upstart “nationalists” who are waging something of a cloak-and-dagger fight to wrest control of U.S. intelligence, national security, and foreign-policy interests from the establishment players they call “globalists.” In the view of these nationalists, they are up against a well-coordinated and ruthless campaign by many of the country’s most powerful people to undo, and if necessary overthrow, Trump’s government. Such threats to democracy, they posit, could justify extreme measures in response.
Have You Heard the One About the ClintonSoros Plot to Overthrow Trump
In a text-message exchange last month, Prince encouraged me to investigate Bill and Hillary Clinton’s conspicuous choice of purple clothing when she delivered her presidential concession speech. When I asked Prince what he was driving at, he explained, “Purple revolution lore… I think it’s a Soros thing.”
But when I pressed him for more information, Prince, who is fond of citing the Prussian military theorist Carl von Clausewitz, invoked Sun Tzu instead, responding cryptically, “Know your enemy.” Then he quickly corrected himself, amending “enemy” to “opponent.” He hasn’t responded to follow-up requests for more information.
The notion of a “Purple Revolution”—which was new to me—is outlined on a number of obscure websites, including several known for promoting conspiracy theories and pro-Kremlin narratives. One overview comes in an article published by the Strategic Culture Foundation, a Russian think tank founded by a former member of the Soviet Politburo that often gives voice to western conspiracy theories.
The article also zeroes in on the significance of the concession-speech outfits, and suggested that the Clintons were sending a signal that would encourage “Soros-style street protests and political disruption.”
IIRC wearing purple meant that you were a member of the resistance. I read it as a signal to the whole world that “I’m an idiot!”.