HORRIFIC: Facebook says vulgar drag queen ‘abortion’ video doesn’t violate standards

LIVE ACTION NEWS ^ | Nov 5, 2019 | Cassy Fiano-Chesser

[Morgana]

WARNING: This content is extremely graphic and disturbing.

A video shared to Facebook has not only raised eyebrows, but is causing people to question the social media organization’s bias. Azeret Nichols posted a video of a drag queen performing in what appears to be a bar, singing along to Kesha’s “Cannibal,” while sporting a fake pregnant belly. After a moment, the drag queen takes a knife and begins cutting into the belly, and then reaches inside to dip his hands into fake blood, which he scoops into a glass and drinks. He then proceeds to pull a fake baby out of his stomach, continuing to lick and drink the fake blood. The video ends after the drag queen rips the fake baby apart and dances with it.

People were understandably outraged — not only because of the video’s content, but because Facebook refused to cover or censor the video in any way, as is often done with pro-life content. It was also criticized because it was allowed to remain up during Pregnancy and Infant Loss Awareness Month. The drag queen in the video, Blair Back, also posted gruesome photos on Facebook, which he captioned, “I had a girl. Her name is Anita Bortion.” He also posted a picture of himself before the “performance” wearing the pregnant belly, in which he wrote, “I’ve been having contractions all morning!!! I can’t wait to get these BABIES out of me.” He also mocked the responses from people who were offended by the video.

WARNING: VIDEO EXTREMELY GRAPHIC AND DISTURBING.

Other disturbing videos have surfaced from abortion supporters; one, for example, showed a group of college students playing “Abortion wars,” in which they stuffed balloons underneath their shirts and tried to stab each other, laughing and shouting, “Kill that baby!” A Netflix cartoon, “Bojack Horseman,” also featured an abortion storyline, in which a character sings, “Get dat fetus, kill dat fetus.”

Screenshots sent to Live Action News showed that after the “pregnant drag queen” abortion video was reported, Facebook reviewed it and said it didn’t violate their community standards.

Meanwhile, posts that should have been completely uncontroversial — showing nothing more than the biological facts of human development — were covered, as more screenshots provided to Live Action News showed.

Facebook has also frequently censored Live Action materials, blurring out pictures of a baby in the womb, for example, or has removed other graphics, labeling them as “hate speech.” Facebook has also refused to allow Live Action advertisements, while allowing Planned Parenthood ads.

Perhaps most notorious example, however, was Facebook’s biased and inaccurate “fact check” of Live Action, which included misrepresented information from both Live Action and Live Action founder and president Lila Rose. Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg admitted there was a “clear bias” to their fact check, though he did not go so far as to take action to prevent it from happening again.

The horrific drag queen video going uncontested by Facebook is another sign of the site’s pro-abortion bias. While pro-life information and content is frequently removed or censored, offensive content that makes a mockery of abortion and can be painful to anyone who has suffered a pregnancy loss is allowed to remain.

[Morgana]

There you have it FReepers nothing the mentally ill do is wrong.

[tgdunbar]

well, it doesn’t violate THEIR standards.

[miss marmelstein]

Vulgar? Try demonic.

[KittyKares]

It’s sick.

[Huskrrrr]

Jesus continues to weep. When will it end?

[jeffc]

The only thing that violates Fakebook “standards” is anything conservative...

[lee martell]

I still have not figured out why many gay and Trans people are so ‘concerned’ with abortion issues?
What do they care? Most of them won’t ever have babies or cause babies to be born?
Many gay & Trans Pro-Abortion people are the most hysterical and vulgar at protesting any Pro-Life sentiments.

[clintonh8r]

I didn’t know that Facebook has standards......

[Bob434]

Their vile demonic sins are not going unnoticed by God

[Rurudyne]

Pretty much.

The cultural Left is like a poster child for why Romans 1:18-32 is true.

[Perseverando]

Hey Morgana,

Thanks for posting. Thanks for your love for the preborn and, I’m certain, the born as well.

God bless you!

[Mrs. Don-o]

All of these issues --- bugger, gender-scrambling, etc -- revolve around the "right" to seek sexual gratification with anyone, at any time, in any way, unconstrained by anything like the concept of "normal" or "natural" or "healthy," and especially seeking modes of jiggery-pokery deviating from procreative intercourse.

The upshot is, any sex is OK except normal procreative sex. So everybody is entitled at least to the last-ditch emergency measure of making sure that if a kid inadvertently results, it is dead on arrival.

[SkyDancer]

And neither did this:

'How to pick up Jewish chicks':

Vile antisemitic picture shows human remains on a shovel - but Facebook refused to remove it

Facebook has been accused of "enabling vicious Jewish hatred" after telling users an image depicting human remains on a shovel below the tag line "How to pick up Jewish chicks" did not breach its standards.

Just days after back flipping on its decision to censor an iconic Vietnam War photo of a naked girl escaping a napalm bombing, the social media giant is again under fire over its handling of posts reported as offensive.

In reply to complaints about the shovel image - which was widely shared, "liked" 21,000 times, and received more than 37,000 comments - Facebook said: "We reviewed the post you reported for displaying hate speech and found it doesn't violate our community standards."

Under its community standards policy, Facebook says it "removes hate speech" that attacks people based on their race, ethnicity, national origin and religious affiliation.

"We allow humour, satire or social commentary related to these topics, and we believe that when people use their authentic identity, they are more responsible when they share this kind of commentary," the policy says.

The image was posted to a page attributed to a Queensland man late last month and shared 2280 times. It has now been removed but tens of thousands of comments, many of which are anti-Semitic, were still visible in the thread as late as Thursday.

A Facebook spokesman said the image was removed for breaching community standards and that the company was still investigating.

But 24 hours after being asked, the spokesman could still not say when the photo was taken down. Facebook could also not explain why only the photo was initially removed and not the entire thread - which is standard when a post is pulled.

[PGalt]

Abort the eugenicist’s puppets. Men...it’s in your hands. Use it wisely. LIFE BUMP!

[miss marmelstein]

So many of them are mentally ill, have drug and alcohol problems and have had bad relationships with their mothers. They turn it into a hatred of women and their biological functions in general. Why do all drag queens dress from a period in the 1940s? You’ll never see a drag queen in a track suit and sneakers. That’s because they are also fetishists. All transgender men are fetishists.

[BenLurkin]

Unbeleivable.

[lee martell]

That does make a sort of twisted sense, from their point of view. On a mission to debauch and besmirch all the iconic vignettes of being a Woman. Being engergized by hate can be ruinous to the soul.

[a fool in paradise]

They are anti-breeder.

[Ruy Dias de Bivar]

And to think, I just got out of FB jail last week for something I posted. Wish I knew what it was as it must have been a dilly!

I am reminded of Kafka’s THE TRIAL “a man arrested and prosecuted by a remote, inaccessible authority, with the nature of his crime revealed neither to him nor to the reader.” Wikipedia

[yldstrk]

Standards? Snort