| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
|
Locked on 10/27/2019 11:53:12 AM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:
Fake news - under review |
Posted on 10/27/2019 10:38:59 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
So if we allow them to continue to kill, rape, maim, etc, they will lose followers???
“These people are certifiably insane.”
Which ones???? U.S. MSM or Isis, or both???
To paraphrase Gen. Tommy Franks, “we’ve got more bullets than they’ve got a$$hole$.”
Great response. It used to be our differences ended at the water’s (ocean) edge. That seems to have who ended with Clinton, then Carter post presidencies.
It shouldn’t matter who is sitting in the WH when a notorious enemy is taken out. Criticism of obozo and bin laden was because of how the demokraps/media turned it into campaign material for them ... it was focused obozo’s “great leadership, resolve, decision-making, risk,” blah blah blah. Even HRC was in the situation room picture for future campaign reference. The focus should have been on the killing of bin laden - but it was on obozo...
And it would have been wrong for anyone to point out back then that obozo was claiming credit even though the demokraps have been anti-US defense, voted against many military spending bills as a party and for cutting/gutting defense, the reality is that those who passed these defense bills over decades made it possible for bin laden to be killed. The dispute ends at the water’s edge.
And God bless your grandmother too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.