Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: treetopsandroofs

I had heard 13,000, but I was wrong. It was more like 16,000
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Past_sea_level#/media/File:Post-Glacial_Sea_Level.png


5 posted on 08/22/2019 7:30:06 PM PDT by Andyman (The truth shall make you FReep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Andyman

Thanks, yeah, I was using the article’s own numbers to refute their dogma.


6 posted on 08/22/2019 7:32:25 PM PDT by treetopsandroofs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Andyman

There are probably tens of thousands of sites like these underwater somewhere. The oceans were almost 400 feet below current sea levels then.

People have always used beaches and inlets as food sources. Many people lived on the shore. The shores of those times are many miles out to sea in our time.

I’d be fascinated by our own continent’s off shore discoveries. If people had boats to settle Australia 50,000 years ago, they had boats to travel down North America’s Pacific coast.


30 posted on 08/23/2019 5:24:01 AM PDT by Alas Babylon! (The media is after us. Trump's just in the way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson