Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/27/2019 8:28:42 AM PDT by McQ444
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
To: McQ444
A Carter appointee.
2 posted on 07/27/2019 8:30:36 AM PDT by CaptainK ('No collusion, no obstruction, he's a leaker')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McQ444
He did not dismiss it with prejudice. So it can be amended with the parts the judge objected to corrected and refiled.
4 posted on 07/27/2019 8:33:30 AM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McQ444

I recall some liberal judge in Florida tossed George Zimmerman’s lawsuit against NBC over their edited 911 call that was aired on “Dateline”. Would like to see someday that these people get their comeuppance big time.


5 posted on 07/27/2019 8:33:46 AM PDT by OttawaFreeper ("The Gardens was founded by men-sportsmen-who fought for their country" Conn Smythe, 1966)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McQ444

Another reason, possible legal threats from one Mr.Besos,owner of the WP.


8 posted on 07/27/2019 8:40:57 AM PDT by Biggirl ("One Lord, one faith, one baptism" - Ephesians 4:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McQ444

What a joke this country has become that everything literally depends on courts and whether or not you get lucky that the judge was appointed by the right presidential administration.


9 posted on 07/27/2019 8:41:13 AM PDT by Shadow44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McQ444
We simply do not have enough here to make an intelligent judgment about this ruling.

The court says the newspaper has a First Amendment right to pass along opinions which characterize, perhaps inaccurately, facts.

We do not know what the state of knowledge of the Washington Post was when they published the article. Did the Post know the actual state of the facts from other videos that might have been in their possession? What facts might be imputed to the Washington Post from other sources?

At this stage of the proceedings, it is probable that discovery was not far advanced and therefore there might well have been actual knowledge somewhere in the Washington Post system that would have lead a reasonable person to believe that the account was fictitious. We don't know.

Did the Washington Post simply publish in this article Phelp's version without any independent checking? If so, the court seems to grant it absolute immunity. That alone, it seems to me, should be grounds for appeal. Does not The Post have an affirmative duty if it seeks to profit by publishing to make at least independent inquiry? This court says not. Perhaps this law might be changed?


10 posted on 07/27/2019 8:41:40 AM PDT by nathanbedford (attack, repeat, attack! Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McQ444

Covington Catholic High School students just got a free college degree on our justice system, torts, mass media, and American Government.


11 posted on 07/27/2019 8:41:48 AM PDT by blackdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McQ444

it was dismissed because wapo printed an opinion- the judge ruled that wapo could not be held liable because the indian was allowed to have an opinion about what happened, even if it was wrong-

That basically is the bottom line- so what this means is the msm can hire lackeys to lie about conservatives, wapo can print the lies, and the conservative’s lives can be destroyed and noone can be held liable apparently- Some racket!


12 posted on 07/27/2019 8:42:13 AM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McQ444

As long as the PIAPS and/or the Kenyan Usurper, along with their vile ilk are free to roam and forage the countryside there is NO equal justice under the law.


13 posted on 07/27/2019 8:45:15 AM PDT by lgjhn23 (It's easy to be liberal when you're dumber than a box of rocks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McQ444

So it’s okay to print misinformation as 1st. Amend rights according to this judge.


14 posted on 07/27/2019 8:45:41 AM PDT by SkyDancer ( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~ Eat Sleep Fly Repeat ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McQ444

“Native American”

Always capitalized.

I’m native American. No hyphen, no ethnic descriptors. None of my ancestors tried to murder white Christian settlers to intimidate them from settling empty land. But he’s the Always Capitalized Native American?


18 posted on 07/27/2019 8:48:07 AM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McQ444

Clean it up based on this judge’s opinion and appeal/re-file it.
Too much at stake not to.


19 posted on 07/27/2019 8:53:23 AM PDT by lgjhn23 (It's easy to be liberal when you're dumber than a box of rocks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McQ444

Bezos -> U.S. District Judge William Bertelsman $$$$$$


20 posted on 07/27/2019 8:56:10 AM PDT by antidemoncrat (yawn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McQ444

This was an important ruling to protect the right of the press to outright lie.


23 posted on 07/27/2019 8:58:44 AM PDT by robel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McQ444

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/freedom-of-the-press

freedom of the press
noun
the right to publish newspapers, magazines, and other printed matter without governmental restriction and subject only to the laws of libel, obscenity, sedition, etc.


25 posted on 07/27/2019 9:04:03 AM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McQ444

Fomenting dissent among the races with known lies as video evidence that was known at the timeabout what factually occurred was available.

Yelling fire in a theater isn’t protected.


28 posted on 07/27/2019 9:06:59 AM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McQ444

After reading the article I have no idea what happened.


29 posted on 07/27/2019 9:07:29 AM PDT by DariusBane (Liberty and Risk. Flip sides of the same coin. So how much risk will YOU accept? Vive Deo et Vives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McQ444

The judge is saying the press CAN defame someone? Isn’t that what the judge ruled?

By the way, here are some past court cases on the press and defamation.

https://www.thefire.org/first-amendment-library/freedom-of-the-press/defamation-press/


36 posted on 07/27/2019 9:15:06 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McQ444

I’m frankly shocked. Bertlesman is a vindictive asswipe with a brain the size of a pea. But, something must have got to him. Maybe the bigshot out of town lawyer thing. Maybe he is anti-catholic.


41 posted on 07/27/2019 9:24:49 AM PDT by anton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McQ444

He tossed it out because he’s a Rat hack and considers the Post heroes for taking out Nixon. Yes he’s that old.


47 posted on 07/27/2019 9:45:03 AM PDT by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson