That one was a doozy.
At this point, anything is possible.
Could be another cover story. Who knows?
5.56mm
I immediately heard this song playing in my head: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n3atTP6hqlg
Russians blew up their own sub again sounds more like it.
Scuttled the US vessel? Is this a translation error?
Doesn’t sound true to me, having known US people in the anti-submarine world. I can’t imagine that our folks would do that, and I think - since the EU has been alerted - that this is actually about something Iran is doing or has done.
Maybe why Pence suddenly returned to the White House this morning......
Andrei... you’ve lost another submarine?
In before the obligatory Fred Thompson pic?
Something could be up:
Pence -> “meeting in DC”. Who knows where he is now...
Putin - Meets with defense minister
Russian sub fire / gold was dropping and pops up.
What a piece of crap for an article. Was the US ship sank by the Russians or was the Russian sub ‘scuttled’. Scuttled is vastly different from ‘sank’. Why happened to the officers and crew of the Russian sub where so many wee killed/died, especially on an unmanned submarine. unmanned means no one was on board. Are we at war with Russia? Were they in our territorial waters?
My third grade grandson could have written this article with more information. Not fake news but really stupid.
The writing indicates English is a third or fourth language.
someone call Sarah Palin, she undoubtably watched it all from her front porch
and she will certainly give us the straight story
That one was a doozy.
Sounds really bad.
“First reports reaching DEBKAfile’s military sources say that a US submarine intercepted a Russian nuclear sub in American waters opposite Alaska. The Russian sub escorting the nuclear submarine responded with a Balkan 2000 torpedo and scuttled the US vessel. Urgent consultations in both the White House and the Kremlin were taking place on Tuesday night.”
Terrible about the poor people on the US sub.
But starting WW-3 is still not the solution.
Debka may not be considered fully reliable, but I have seen them reporting things first, before anyone else, and eventually the MSM picks it up.
Their site traffic must be down, time to say something outrageous to get the ad revenue back up.
Does anyone really need to explain why this is utter nonsense?
bookmark
Sounds 90% BS, conjecture, guess, fake. Will probably never know true story.
The only news sources with less credibility are the New York Times and Washington Post.