little jeremiah wrote:
“Very strange coincidence that President Trump announces to the world to tune into a fox news program for an esposé on government corruption and 2 hours later there is a mass shooting by a guy armed with an extended round 45, with a silencer, in a government building— Wyatt (@SayWhenLA) June 1, 2019”
Ping to this info!!!
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Thank you for pinging me that information, WildHighlander. Thanks for that post, lj.
There has been some discussion about the “Five Buckets” of data. In a recent post, I was able to report how they are defined:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3752292/posts?page=946#946
Last night on Hannity, we learned that there is MORE.
FIVE BUCKETS AND MORE
On March 31, 2019, Hannity on Fox News had a special with a panel discussing where we are with the investigations. In the first airing of the program, the last 15 minutes were pre-empted by the story/press conference regarding the shooting in Virginia Beach.
Darlin and I recorded the 2nd airing and obtained those final 15 minutes. I searched for a link to the program and was unable to find a link containing those 15 minutes. Following is a rough synopsis and in some cases direct quotes of what transpired in those 15 minutes.
Hannity interviewed PapaD and Michael Caputo. They discussed the approaches they recalled by what they realize in retrospect were agents setting them up on foreign soil.
At one point in the process, with the subtitle at the bottom of the screen reading “The Deep State’s Day of Reckoning,” Hannity turned to panelist*, Jon Solomon and said, “ Five Buckets, and it has only just begun. We expect the Inspector General Report first. “
Jon Solomon:
“YOU’VE GOT FIVE THINGS TO WATCH FOR - ***PLUS*** FIVE BUCKETS.”
[He counts them off on fingers.]
1.Criminal Investigation with US Attorney in Connecticut, Durham
2.You’ve got the Administrative Investigation with the Inspector General
3.You’ve got the overarching investigation and work which Bill Barr himself is doing
4.Then you’ve got possibility of litigation - FISA Court maybe come out and give us something
5.And finally, you have all these Congressional oversight hearings that can elicit things we have not seen in a long time.”
[texokie note: “seen in a long time” .... that is interesting. ]
Jon continues:
“I think the most important thing to watch in the next month - I think the Mueller Report is going to unravel on two accounts.
1.Factual inaccurate information
2.Very significant material omissions
Keep an eye on that dynamic. That could be one of the most important…”
[Hannity interjects...
Turns to panel and asks, “How many of you think Obama and Biden knew? - show of hands?”]
[Got hands and nods from everyone, plus someone said “Oh yeah,” (or some other similar affirmation.)]
Hannity:
Will there be indictments?
Victoria says:
“No….” References the Lisa Page text where POTUS wants to keep informed. …talking points for James Comey to brief Obama
[texokie note: I found it hard to follow her reasoning, other than prior actions wherein the double standards prevailed. She seemed quite cynical and frustrated.]
Matt Schlapp:
Speaks of the unmaskings - Samantha Powers should be [indicted]
“I spoke with John Negroponte, a UN Ambassador and DNI, and I asked how many unmaskings did he do? He said” ZERO”….
Matt says, “Hundreds of unmaskings - that has to be held accountable.”
Pam Bondi:
“And because have an ethical REAL Attorney General now in Bill Barr, we shouldn’t be knowing what is going on. That’s why we aren’t hearing all the details of what’s happening. Any justice investigation should be kept in confidence. “
Geraldo:
“I want everyone to keep in mind the victim here: the 45th President….He could not trust anyone…Imagine if he could have focused on his job instead of the sabatoge…”
Doug Shoen:
He wants to know “how the Dossier was initially commissioned, who was involved in it, how we have the DNC, Perkins Coie, the FBI all involved. Let’s hear from the Secretary of State…”
[Hannity steps on him with the point of the FISA warrant having at the top of the form “VERIFIED” printed. “And unverified information was used. “ He then closes the program.]
*Panelists included Greg Jarrett, Sarah Carter, Jon Solomon, Victoria Toensing, Joe DeGeneva, Doug Schoen, Tom Fitton, Geraldo, Pam Bondi, and Matt Schlapp
Thanks for that
The uninterrupted hannity video is at post 267
The part that was prempted starts at
about 33 minutes
httpss://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3753561/posts?page=267#267
Thank you so much for those notes. I hope the entire show becomes available. This was indeed very interesting:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
5.And finally, you have all these Congressional oversight hearings that can elicit things we have not seen in a long time.”
[texokie note: “seen in a long time” .... that is interesting. ]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Benghazi? Fast and Furious? IRS targeting? The stopping of Operation Cassandra? Arab Spring and $ sent to Egypt to get Morsi/Moslem Bros in charge? And much much more!
Victoria says:
“No….” References the Lisa Page text where POTUS wants to keep informed. …talking points for James Comey to brief Obama
[texokie note: I found it hard to follow her reasoning, other than prior actions wherein the double standards prevailed. She seemed quite cynical and frustrated.]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Hannity, Sara Carter and John Solomon know a lot more than Victoria. I do not believe for a split second that there won’t be indictments. Was she saying that in a general way or very narrowly?
Hannity:
Will there be indictments?
Victoria says:
“No….” References the Lisa Page text where POTUS wants to keep informed. …talking points for James Comey to brief Obama
[texokie note: I found it hard to follow her reasoning, other than prior actions wherein the double standards prevailed. She seemed quite cynical and frustrated.]
IMO that’s disinformation. Just a teeny weeny toothpick for the DS to hang onto in order to convince themselves that they have a chance of staying afloat.
Also IMO, *IF* she’s right, it will be because of clever wording. Maybe there “won’t be” because there “already have been”. Maybe there will be some no name type endings. Maybe there will be some red scarves in some people’s futures. I’m not sure how this will all play out, but confident that the Q team will play it all within the law.
If they (Q team) weren’t going to do everything by the book, they would have come out with guns blazing from the git-go. The Q team intends for this to absolutely ironclad, irrefutable, done cleanly. The evidence will be impossible to ignore or deny. The methods will be sound with no legal loopholes to challenge them. The swamp will be drained down to the last drop. And above all, they will act with moral authority, not just legal.
Again, JMO.
Many many many thanks for that synopsis of the last part/pre-empted part of the Hannity Special about the investigations !!