I point folks, however, to the very big dog that refused to whimper, much less bark. If Trump were guilty of some form of collusion or obstruction, it is inconceivable that he did so without involving at least one other member of his administration. If there were such a person, that individual would be subject to indictment and prosecution. The Mueller investigation did not find such a person -- because there was no collusion or obstruction.
Excellent point!
If Trump were guilty of some form of collusion or obstruction, it is inconceivable that he did so without involving at least one other member of his administration. If there were such a person, that individual would be subject to indictment and prosecution. The Mueller investigation did not find such a person — because there was no collusion or obstruction.
Another EXCELLENT observation.
Something smells funny about this entire charade. I’m sticking with my theory that team Trump has some reason to drag this out and give the derps false hope. Or maybe more rope to hang themselves.
The most important point of all.
So, if Trump is guilty but can't be indicted, where are the indictments for those who helped him collude and obstruct.
The thought that Trump, all by himself, colluded with Russia or "obstructed" justice and can't be charged with it is poppycock, balderdash, and hornswoggle. The product of a fevered derp mind.
I like that you posted that, AZ. It s a great argument.
