[bagster]

If Trump were guilty of some form of collusion or obstruction, it is inconceivable that he did so without involving at least one other member of his administration. If there were such a person, that individual would be subject to indictment and prosecution. The Mueller investigation did not find such a person -- because there was no collusion or obstruction.

The most important point of all.

So, if Trump is guilty but can't be indicted, where are the indictments for those who helped him collude and obstruct.

The thought that Trump, all by himself, colluded with Russia or "obstructed" justice and can't be charged with it is poppycock, balderdash, and hornswoggle. The product of a fevered derp mind.

I like that you posted that, AZ. It s a great argument.

[little jeremiah]

"Among other things, that evidence could be used if there were co-conspirators who could be charged now."

No co-conspirators were charged.

So Trump "committed obstruction" all by himself? Seems a heavy lift when Trump has an entire White House Staff who could help him.— Bill Mitchell (@mitchellvii) May 29, 2019