Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Cats Pajamas; deks
Mueller at 11am. Just saw it announced on local CBS affiliate. Thanks!

 
 
 
 
 
 

Special counsel Robert Mueller to make statement Wednesday on the ...

CNBC-15 minutes ago
Special counsel Robert Mueller will make a statement on ... his first public comments regarding the high-profile probe he was appointed to lead two years ago. The event, scheduled for 11 a.m. ET at the Department of Justice, ...
Robert Mueller will make first public statements on Russia ...
ForexLive-15 minutes ago
 
Story image for mueller comments 11 am from The New York Times

Robert Mueller to Make Statement on Russia Investigation

The New York Times-8 minutes ago
WASHINGTON — Robert S. Mueller III, the special counsel, will ... 11 a.m. on Wednesday morning, his first public comments since he took over ...
 
 
Story image for mueller comments 11 am from New York Post

Robert Mueller to make first public statement about Russia probe

New York Post-1 minute ago
Special counsel Robert Mueller will make his first public comments about his report on ... Mueller is scheduled to make the statement at 11 a.m. ...

765 posted on 05/29/2019 7:05:18 AM PDT by haffast (Alternate universes held together by porridge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 756 | View Replies ]


To: haffast
Mueller to make 1st public statement on Russia probe
Regina Leader-Post-10 minutes ago

The Regina Leader-Post? I actually lived in Regina (Saskatchewan) a long time ago. While listening to CBC Radio on SiriusXM recently, I heard someone mention the "Regina Monologues". I don't think they were referring to the Simpson's episode of the same name (with the Queen and the actual voice of Tony Blair), but to something more recent and indigenous.

And yes, unlike the Latin name for the Queen, the name of the city is pronounced with a long "i".

902 posted on 05/29/2019 10:36:24 AM PDT by AZLiberty (218 House seats or bust! Bust. But the Dems will be busted for election fraud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 765 | View Replies ]

To: haffast
I watched Mueller. He basically summarizes the conclusions of the long report, maintaining the ambiguity inherent in the constitutional prohibition against indicting a sitting president. Derps exploit this ambiguity to imply that President Trump would have been indicted if it weren't for this prohibition.

I point folks, however, to the very big dog that refused to whimper, much less bark. If Trump were guilty of some form of collusion or obstruction, it is inconceivable that he did so without involving at least one other member of his administration. If there were such a person, that individual would be subject to indictment and prosecution. The Mueller investigation did not find such a person -- because there was no collusion or obstruction.

921 posted on 05/29/2019 10:58:31 AM PDT by AZLiberty (218 House seats or bust! Bust. But the Dems will be busted for election fraud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 765 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson