Posted on 05/26/2019 12:16:08 PM PDT by ransomnote
nite, smiley!
nite, smiley!
You be preaching to the choir. I was had by the meet in the Oval before accepting SC role.
Yes, perhaps he is ingrained with following chain of command. Or perhaps he is too familiar with the acronym, DEATH. Don’t ever antagonize the horn. Probably a good rule of thumb in the DC swamp. Or even Boston.
Affecting my mood, I’m blown away by the concurrence to Box v. PP by Justice Thomas. He prepared for this. With a so deft scalpel he slices and dices PP and eugenics laying bare the moral corruption. In a danged Supreme decision.
“Given the potential for abortion to become a tool of eugenic manipulation, the Court will soon need to confront the constitutionality of laws like Indianas. But because further percolation may assist our review of this issue of first impression, I join the Court in declining to take up the issue now.”
I am happy I lived this long.
Wait, what? OIG "finds preponderance of evidence'? What does that even mean. I posted this beyond the trees. See if it makes sense.
Just FYI. The "preponderance of evidence" is a standard of proof. A lower one than "beyond a reasonable doubt". Horowitz was just, with that line, explaining which standard of proof he used.
It has nothing to do with bringing charges.
FYI also, Horowitz cannot indict. His job is to identify malfeasance within the departments FBI/DOJ. It will be up to the DOJ whether the identified crimes are filed upon.
I also am of the opinion, after a careful reading of the document, that Horowitz was referring to his prior report when he said "prosecution of the DAD [deputy assistant director (Peter Strzok)] was declined".
I'll wait until I hear from the DOJ before I say no charges are forthcoming.
Also, keep in mind that this is one tiny aspect of the IG report and has nothing to do with FISA.
So to conclude. Any writer/pundit that would say "OIG Finds Preponderance of Evidence Against FBI Deputy Asst. Director" identifies himself as somebody that doesn't know what they're talking about.
One does not FIND a 'preponderance of evidence" against anybody. They make a finding BASED on a preponderance of the evidence. Sometimes "beyond a reasonable doubt" is the standard, but not in this case.
So, take these pundit's articles with a grain of salt. It's pretty bad when Bagster knows more about the law then they do, if you ask me. Cause I'm semi-retarted.
p.s. Hold off on melt-down mode. Lots of IG report upcoming.
It's okay. His presentation is effective, and to a wider audience. We need all the troops moving in the right direction. They don't need to be bothered about the Intel and PsyOps stuff right now.
> I am of the opinion that everybody follows Q, whether they know it or not.
Truth!
-SB
WOW.
-SB
That would be an Asian massage.
Strozk was Deputy Assistant Director of the Counterintelligence Division, Andy McCabe was DAD of the FBI.
I believe McCabe is the unprosecuted, unnamed leaker.
Of course,
I Could Be Wrong (Uncensored and Correct Lyrics)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-J8_oXmWpo ~ Tim Wilson
Julian Assange misses his US extradition hearing because he’s ‘too ill to speak’ - hours after he was moved to Belmarsh prison hospital wing amid ‘grave concerns’ for his health
WHAT’S GOING ON HERE?
I'd be willing to participate in the cleanup and restoration of the House Chamber, if the entire RAT caucus were to self-immolate.
I read somewhere that the reason the Just-us Dept. refuses to prosecute crimes that are found thru the OIG is because of a supposed wall the Courts have established that say employees waived their 5th amendment rights for an internal investigation not criminal charges.
I have been wondering all along if the appointment of Durham was a parallel track investigation that would only use evidence discovered thru other means like grand juries, FOIA and Congressional Supeonas etc. so they can be brought up on charges.
Thank you for the updates.
It takes more than prayer. It takes repentance.
Interesting.
I agree the story is BS. But I also wonder if POTUS is allowing it. He is great at taking stupid distractions that the MSM creates and using them for his own purposes.
I hope when all this is over, they rename the ship.
2 CHRONICLES 7:14
Anons.
Q communicates to the Anons...only.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.