Posted on 04/23/2019 8:43:26 AM PDT by mgray
Edited on 04/23/2019 9:15:08 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
In Monday’s post I wrote how Julian Assange and Seth Rich communicated with each other before Wikileaks published the Hillary Clinton emails.
The revelation came to light through a FOIA request of the National Security Agency where they admitted to having 15 documents consisting of 32 pages of conversations between the founder of Wikileaks and the Democratic National Conference worker Rich.
While this information was released quietly in Oct. 2018 in a letter from the NSA to attorney Ty Clevenger’s request for information on communications between the two individuals, Special Counsel Robert Mueller in his report last week still held to the believe that it was the Russians who worked with Assange to hack the Clinton severs.
This is an excerpt from the letter Clevenger received from the NSA:
Your request has been processed under the provisions of the FOIA. Fifteen documents (32 pages) responsive to your request have been reviewed by this Agency as required by the FOIA and have found to be currently and properly classified in accordance with Executive Order 13526. These documents meet the criteria for classification as set forth in Subparagraph © of Section 1.4 and remains classified TOP SECRET and SECRET.
How could Mueller and his cut-throat, partisan investigators turn a blind-eye to the details of the NSA filing?
Because the truth would destroy Mueller’s whole investigation into Trump and the Russian collusion. Despite Mueller already knowing in the middle of 2018 that his lead FBI investigator Peter Strzok and FBI lawyer Lisa Page — caught in an adulteress affair — where telling each other there was no collusion, the NSA revelation had to be ignored.
Bill Binney, one of the founding members of the NSA now retired, stated that if the NSA has 32-pages of information between Rich and Assange it means these two were in communication with each other since that is all the NSA tracks. Emails, phone calls and texts between two parties are all scooped up by the NSA.
Adding to the Russian hack is BS, Binney concludes that the data transfer rate for the Clinton email hack could have been done remotely. It would have to have been downloaded on a thumb drive from a computer within the DNC offices.
So what does this mean vis-a-vis Assange’s arrest earlier this month from the Ecuadorian embassy in London and the Trump White House request for extradiction?
Well the Trump administration does not need for him to testify that there was no Russian collusion, but US Attorney John Huber or DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz may want him to recount Rich’s involvement in the Clinton email release to reopen his 2016 murder case.
Washington DC police said the motive for Rich’s shooting was robbery, but since nothing was taken from the body, this seems wrong.
However given the Assange revelations, this murder case takes on a whole new cast of suspects.
Welcome to FR. Interesting day to join, on Lenin’s b’Earth Day.
His walk home was 2 miles, yet the number of street-viewing minicams the cops requisitioned tape from: ZERO
The number of employees from the bar he departed, pre-shooting: ZERO
He was TALKING to the EMTs
He was expected to recover
His doc was a big-time political activist
The area of his hospital room was OFF LIMITS
The PI hired told Seth’s parents point-blank that the cops had told him the case was political
Come on, they botched it on the street but the stakes were so high they finished him off in the hospital.
Assange cannot testify that Seth Rich's murder was not a simple robbery. All he can do is testify that Seth Rich was the source of the Podesta emails.
Only a blog source without references/citations.
Worthless.
We don’t have a “Justice Department; we’ve had a badly-broken “Legal System”, for the past 50 years.
“I believe Seth Rich gave the emails to Wikileaks, and that is why he was killed.”
The Clintoon’s “Wet Work Team” went to work. He was outright murdered for his leaks to WikiLeaks.
“This may explain why Julian Assange insists there was no “Russian connection” in his acquisition of the now-deleted e-mails from Herself’s server and phones.”
People, we are getting things confused here. Wikileaks published JOHN PODESTA’S emails which were acquired by means of a “phishing” email to John Podesta. Podesta believed this email to be legitimate and revealed his password to his own email account. THIS is how the Podesta emails were ended up being published. Podesta gave them to the “bad guys”!!
Murder has no statute of limitations
Murders by the Clintons are never solved as a matter of course
Welcome to FR.
That is a really good meme. You should post it EVERYWHERE. If I had a facebook account, I’d post it there with your permission.
Missed DWS openly intimidating and threatening the chief of the Capitol police.
The URL is:
http://oi67.tinypic.com/10s9phv.jpg
It’s hosted there permanently for free; I don’t know who originally made it, I simply copied it there from 4chan and hosted it at TinyPic.
If you know basic HTML I’d encourage you to steal, it, too, as I suspect the original author was also pleased when I did.
Nebraska is conservative in some really wrong ways.
Greys Economy is not the source of the story.
Find out what you can about recent sayings from William Binney.
I saw a statement from his mother the other day. She claims he is being held incommunicado, not even his lawyer is allowed to see him. The timing of his arrest with the Mueller confirmation of British intelligence involvement in the coup is troubling.
There have been all kinds of efforts to muddy the story and it is hard to know what is true and what isn't, since essentially every bit of digital evidence can be forged and often is by sophisticated organizations like the CIA, GRU, etc.
You could spend all day reading about different opinions on the issue, but if the timestamps are real, it is unlikely that the data was downloaded across the internet using typical exfiltration schemes.
Another victim of the Grassy Knoll.
Sources inside DC Metro PD tell me it was two Pakistani brothers formerly in the employ of congressional Democrats - the two who were at a DNC-sponsored party with Rich the evening he was murdered. Rich left the party early and the two “suspects” followed shortly thereafter. And yes, I AM referring to the Awan brothers, who couldn’t possibly be associated with the ISI... ?S
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
