Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lockheed Martin unveils lunar lander design to get humans to the Moon by 2024
The Verge ^ | Apr 10, 2019, 3:42pm EDT | Loren Grush

Posted on 04/11/2019 12:41:18 PM PDT by BenLurkin

Lockheed Martin is unveiling new designs for a human lunar lander concept that can take people to and from the lunar surface. And the company says it can be ready within the next five years....

The vehicle consists of two elements: a lander portion that can travel down to the ground, and an ascent vehicle that can lift astronauts off the Moon’s surface. The lander is meant to travel to and from a new space station that NASA wants to build around the Moon called the Gateway. If all of these elements are created, astronauts would travel to the Gateway from Earth and then take the lander from the station to the Moon. The ascent vehicle would then bring them back to the station.

This new lander is separate from another lander concept that Lockheed revealed last year at the International Astronautical Congress. That design called for a much heavier, reusable lander that could take astronauts to the Moon and back in one piece — without the need of a separate ascent element. But...Lockheed has been working on a design that could be developed much more quickly.

A big advantage of this new Lockheed lander concept is that the company won’t be building the vehicle completely from scratch. Many of the elements needed for the vehicle are derived from Orion, a crew capsule that Lockheed has been working on for the last decade. Orion, which is nearing its first flight, is meant to fly astronauts into deep space and dock with the Gateway in the future. Some of the same materials and systems used in Orion could be incorporated into this new lander, such as a lot of the internal equipment, flight computers, life support systems, and more.

(Excerpt) Read more at theverge.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: 2024; boondoggle; elonmusk; falcon9; falconheavy; lockheed; lockheedmartin; lunarlander; moon; orion; sls; spacex; themoon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

1 posted on 04/11/2019 12:41:18 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Looks like R2D2 on a satellite chassis.

Nice suit.


2 posted on 04/11/2019 12:44:32 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi - Monthly Donors Rock!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Grumman has a design already tested. All that needs to be done is to update the flight computer with a bit more memory to eliminate those pesky 1201 alarms on final descent.


3 posted on 04/11/2019 12:45:34 PM PDT by Yo-Yo ( is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

First of all the space station needs to be in earth orbit. Use it as the way station to construct the crafts to get to lunar orbit. Then build the second space station. From that station build the lunar base.


4 posted on 04/11/2019 12:48:21 PM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
You didn't post a picture- From the Site:


5 posted on 04/11/2019 12:48:44 PM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reily

We should have been doing this for the last 50 years!


6 posted on 04/11/2019 12:49:03 PM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Nice video screen. Will astronauts also be forced to watch CNN along with airport travelers?


7 posted on 04/11/2019 12:53:04 PM PDT by Huskrrrr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reily

Need a robot that builds robots that build the space station.


8 posted on 04/11/2019 12:54:13 PM PDT by redshawk (0pansy is a Liar and Hates.........he just hates!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo
Grumman has a design already tested.

That design presumes a 1960s US industrial base, which no longer exists.

The real problem, here, is that we quit going to the Moon back in 1972. This means we have to start from scratch in many respects. We know it can be done, but we still have to (re)invent things. We should have been flying around the Earth-Moon system, and beyond, all these years, and gradually improving our spacecraft. We should have spacecraft right now, with evolutionary heritage back to Apollo ... but we don't. We have a cradle-to-grave welfare state, instead. That's what the democRATs wanted. Can't have Whitey on the Moon; that's racist.

9 posted on 04/11/2019 12:54:19 PM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the peopIe to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Got to be better than the Israeli lander, it crashed today trying to land on the moon.


10 posted on 04/11/2019 12:55:16 PM PDT by Daniel Ramsey (Thank YOU President Trump, finally we can do what America does best, to be the best)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob434

That dude needs to workout those arms.


11 posted on 04/11/2019 12:55:26 PM PDT by NativeSon ( Grease the floor with Crisco when I dance the Disco)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

What a peculiar take on this.


12 posted on 04/11/2019 12:55:33 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

How about a highspeed rail to the moon?


13 posted on 04/11/2019 12:55:36 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Denounce DUAC - The Democrats Un-American Activists Committee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob434

Space women?


14 posted on 04/11/2019 12:56:31 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Denounce DUAC - The Democrats Un-American Activists Committee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

We’ve had 50 years of “if they can put a man on the Moon, then why can’t they ...” (fill in your favorite pet social welfare project.)


15 posted on 04/11/2019 12:56:42 PM PDT by Yo-Yo ( is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

16 posted on 04/11/2019 12:57:02 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I frequently see things from a different angle ...

Is there something you disagree with? Something you’d like to discuss?


17 posted on 04/11/2019 12:57:08 PM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the peopIe to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NativeSon

don’t make fun of old noodle arms


18 posted on 04/11/2019 12:57:27 PM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: NativeSon

Dude looks like a lady


19 posted on 04/11/2019 12:57:33 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Denounce DUAC - The Democrats Un-American Activists Committee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Looks too much like a fire hydrant, moon-doggies will be peeing all over it.


20 posted on 04/11/2019 12:57:48 PM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie (All I know is The I read in the papers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson