Posted on 04/10/2019 4:00:07 AM PDT by C19fan
As to your comment about her feeling as though she has done nothing wrong, absolutely accurate.
She lives by Hollywood's moral standards and such standards, to the extent they actually exist, as illusive as Bigfoot.
We can rest assured that the mood around her dinner table at home is not one of contrition but one of anger and righteous indignation.
I find the desire of the media/left to hang these white women disgusting. They act like it is the worst crime imaginable.
Meanwhile, the same government going after them, allows unqualified black & brown kids to bypass normal qualifications that are stacked against white & Asian kids.
I am baffled. Why don’t I see charges against the university folks that took the money? Surely they should be charged.
Gang bangers in Chicago get out in three years for murdering someone and this girl flashes some money to help her kid and will get 40 years? Something seems terribly wrong with this.
I agree; the double standards involved are sickening - and should serve as a warning to white women everywhere that they are simply next on the list after white guys (blacktivists have already made it clear they want white women off the list of “preferred minorities”; they are not “disadvantaged” enough and therefore deserve no freebies).
I could care less if these perps rot in jail forever (we would if we were convicted of those crimes); at the same time, some dope who posed as a child kidnapping victim is facing 8 years in prison while Juicy Smollett walks after staging a “racio-political” hate crime hoax for which “normals” would face imprisonment.
She should claim she is .06 black and get the trial moved to Chicacago. I am sure she can fake a black accent and blame it on white nationists (crackers).
Most of the schools didn’t know. In the cases of the coaches, they were arrested and fired.
You are conflating and confusing her job with the person she actually is. Just because she plays nice in scripted shows does not mean she is nice in real life or personally upholds the values you appreciate about the shows.
Laor Loughlin doesn’t get it. She was posing for photographs and signing autographs outside the Federal courthouse. This ain’t acting Lori, this is dead serious. You are in trouble.
I figure the team is discussing a range of strategies, costs, and odds. No doubt refusing to take a deal is a deliberate choice, but it could be HER. Her lawyers are obliged to follow her direction or resign.
There is plenty of "wrong" conduct that isn't criminal, so she has room to massage her public message. She can go from the Jussie system of dindu nuthin wrong, to "it was wrong, but it's not right to make me a criminal for it," with plenty of stops in between.
Interesting that the dishonest admissions system, operated by the schools, is so far escaping attention.
The whole charade is designed to imply that white people use money and influence to screw the poor and disenfranchised. The longer Lori Loughland lets this go on, the better for the Democrats and their narrative.
+.
It isn't a charade. One can get whatever justice they can afford. The only falsity in your statement is your injection of race. The only color that matters is green.
I know what we say on FR can be misinterpreted ......nuances are lost....
I am fully aware she is an actress........
I was simply observing her celluloid representation seemed to mirror her tabloid representation
Plenty of actors represent themselves one way.....
.....but then they are plastered online at your friendly newsstand in a totally opposite light....druggies....immodestly dressed....sleeping with someone else’s husband or wife....assault
And neither of you answered why she is the ‘poster girl’ for this fiasco???
Her image is squeaky clean......so therefore she gets owned as a Machiavellian Mafioso
The whole charade is designed to imply that white people use money and influence to screw the poor and disenfranchised.
***************************
It isn’t a charade. One can get whatever justice they can afford. The only falsity in your statement is your injection of race. The only color that matters is green.
***************************
Sad, but true.
circa 1960 Civic class trip to Washington DC exposed us to that fact. Judge asked defense atty. if he was ready to proceed defending his client against burglary charges. Defense requested a delay until their witness Mr. Green returned to the city. Delay granted. On the bus ride back to school our teacher explained that waiting for Mr. Green was common code for the lawyer waiting to be paid. No green, no defense...keep sitting in jail.
circa 1960 Civic class trip to Washington DC exposed us to that fact. Judge asked defense atty. if he was ready to proceed defending his client against burglary charges. Defense requested a delay until their witness Mr. Green returned to the city. Delay granted. On the bus ride back to school our teacher explained that waiting for Mr. Green was common code for the lawyer waiting to be paid. No green, no defense...keep sitting in jail.
“Her image is squeaky clean......so therefore she gets owned as a Machiavellian Mafioso”
Who cares about her image? She can present herself as squeaky clean all she wants, but she isn’t squeaky clean, is she?
She is an actual criminal. She is the embodiment of liberal privilege, and she’s arrogant.
I hope she suffers bigly.
All she needs is one hallmark fan on the jury and she’s got a decent chance at beating this.
The bribes were "washed" through a phony "do-good" foundation, listed as "donations."
Some of the bribers now have tax problems b/c they listed the bribe as a “charitable donation to the fake foundation”
They even got written letters in return that said, “Thank you for your generous donation.”
To make the bribes appear legitimate they received receipts falsely indicating that “no goods or services were
exchanged” for their supposed donations to the foundation, according to authorities.
Loughlin and her husband allegedly hid their payments in two $200,000 wire transfers to the “charity” to get their daughters into USC.
Another couple allegedly made a contribution of $400,000 to secure admission for their daughter to Georgetown. One family is accused of “donating” $900,000.
Huffman paid $15,000 to the fake “foundation” on behalf of her eldest daughter, according to the FBI.
Using the US mail to facilitate the fraud also comes with penalties.....as do wire-transfers.
Do you suppose the colleges will be held responsible, for any of this?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.