I know what we say on FR can be misinterpreted ......nuances are lost....
I am fully aware she is an actress........
I was simply observing her celluloid representation seemed to mirror her tabloid representation
Plenty of actors represent themselves one way.....
.....but then they are plastered online at your friendly newsstand in a totally opposite light....druggies....immodestly dressed....sleeping with someone else’s husband or wife....assault
And neither of you answered why she is the ‘poster girl’ for this fiasco???
Her image is squeaky clean......so therefore she gets owned as a Machiavellian Mafioso
“Her image is squeaky clean......so therefore she gets owned as a Machiavellian Mafioso”
Who cares about her image? She can present herself as squeaky clean all she wants, but she isn’t squeaky clean, is she?
She is an actual criminal. She is the embodiment of liberal privilege, and she’s arrogant.
I hope she suffers bigly.
I don’t believe she is the “poster girl” for the situation. Although she might be the best-known of the individuals charged, she is not a huge star. I don’t consume tabloids so don’t know her representation there. However, what she has actually done to be charged with crimes speaks to her real values. Cheat and bribe to get her daughters into big-name schools. Teach her daughters that’s how to get ahead in life. Some “family values” she actually practices. Would her crimes be any less if she were not a celebrity? No. It’s only our celebrity besotted culture that makes her a sympathetic figure in your eyes.