To: Mr170IQ
The filenames are clearly timestamps. i.e. 170901_1554.mp3 would be Sept 1, 2017 3:54PMNon-US date format. Software probably written by someone outside of the US. So my guess would be NOT a "big name" program or one that's part of bloatware on the laptop.
To: VeniVidiVici
re: “Non-US date format. “
EASILY sortable in a directory though ...
30 posted on
04/07/2019 5:27:53 AM PDT by
_Jim
(Save babies)
To: VeniVidiVici
That’s similar to the format I us when I use the date in a file name. You need to have the year first, in order to sort properly.
34 posted on
04/07/2019 5:36:52 AM PDT by
BykrBayb
(Lung cancer free since 11/9/07. Colon cancer free since 7/7/15. Obama free since 1/20/17. PTL ~ Þ)
To: VeniVidiVici
71 posted on
04/07/2019 7:46:48 AM PDT by
Rusty0604
(2020 four more years!)
To: VeniVidiVici
Non-US date format. Software probably written by someone outside of the US. So my guess would be NOT a "big name" program or one that's part of bloatware on the laptop. Not necessarily. File names constructed in that manner automatically alphabetizes the files in the order the files were created. Year, month, day, then time. Putting the year in the traditional third position would not, requiring a parsing routine to sort the files. This approach requires no such parsing. I agree it’s deliberate, but it’s something I’d do as a database designer.
73 posted on
04/07/2019 8:58:34 AM PDT by
Swordmaker
(My pistol self-identifies as an iPad, so you must accept it in gun-free zones, you hoplaphobe bigot!)
To: VeniVidiVici
Non-US date format.Not necessarily. Putting the year up front makes for easier sorting by filename. I use that format all the time for date-stamped filenames.
111 posted on
04/08/2019 11:49:39 AM PDT by
zeugma
(Power without accountability is fertilizer for tyranny.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson