The limits that Publius posted seem as though unless there is an actual military uprising taking and holding territory in CONUS, no military tribunals.
That’s hard to believe.
Reread. There have been many insurrection. Sanctuary “anything” are on-going insurrection.
For military action to take place there must be intentional disregard and ejection of federal law enforcers. We could have come to that in many places but kinetic action was withheld by the (legitimate) state.
The white hats are applying pressure and some turn fool is gonna try to lead a full on charge (Harper’s Ferry?) And the military shoe will drop.
Cause it’s incorrect and the reason I posted the Graham Kavanaugh questions which specifically refers to two supreme Court cases
Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507 (2004), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court recognized the power of the U.S. government to detain enemy combatants, including U.S. citizens, but ruled that detainees who are U.S. citizens must have the rights of due process
And
Johnson v. Eisentrager, U.S. Supreme Court case in which the court ruled in 1950 that nonresident enemy aliens do not have the legal right to petition U.S. courts for writs of habeas corpus—a prisoner’s petition requesting that the court determine the legality of his or her incarceration.
Which you may notice occured in 1950 and 2004
And at neither time was there a military uprising in the US
https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=oOAkU_4iPYA