Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: little jeremiah

Cause it’s incorrect and the reason I posted the Graham Kavanaugh questions which specifically refers to two supreme Court cases

Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507 (2004), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court recognized the power of the U.S. government to detain enemy combatants, including U.S. citizens, but ruled that detainees who are U.S. citizens must have the rights of due process

And

Johnson v. Eisentrager, U.S. Supreme Court case in which the court ruled in 1950 that nonresident enemy aliens do not have the legal right to petition U.S. courts for writs of habeas corpus—a prisoner’s petition requesting that the court determine the legality of his or her incarceration.

Which you may notice occured in 1950 and 2004
And at neither time was there a military uprising in the US

https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=oOAkU_4iPYA


815 posted on 04/03/2019 7:05:55 PM PDT by BiggBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 802 | View Replies ]


To: BiggBob; Cletus.D.Yokel

Thank you for the additional.


824 posted on 04/03/2019 7:28:49 PM PDT by little jeremiah (When we do not punish evildoers we are ripping the foundations of justice from future generations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 815 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson