Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Snowybear; bagster; TEXOKIE; ransomnote; greeneyes; generally; Pete from Shawnee Mission; ...

Thanks Snowybear.

Worth a look, not sure if it is real, but here is an exceprt.

However, some of you have found photos of her with P. Diddy and Paris Hilton. I know more about those. Rachel has been a friend of Paris Hilton for a LONG time. I think they’ve been friends since Rachel was about 13 or 14. When we were all high-school aged, Rachel was known for frequently going clubbing with Paris, hitting up movie/TV “industry parties”, going to fashion events, and presented herself as an aspiring model. I have no idea what was going on during those events, but people alternatively admired/resented her for frequently partying with famous celebrities and rolling everywhere with Paris and Nicky Hilton. She was rumored to be a big drinker/drug user and struggled academically. During high school (2001-2005), there was an incident where Paris Hilton’s phone was hacked and her contacts were posted online. It was one of the first major “celebrity hackings” that I remember ever becoming a big news story. Rachel was, I dunno, 15 or 16 at the time (?), and her phone number was one of the ones that was leaked because she was in Paris’s contacts list. I have no idea if all the crazy stuff you guys are pegging her (being a “child handler”) with has any validity, but I can tell you that during her teenage years she knew A LOT of celebrities, media industry insiders, and was going to a lot of parties that most kids at her school and in our social circles (who were pretty well-connected and very wealthy themselves) could never gain access to. She’s definitely someone who “matured quickly”, if you will. I know that at age 18 she had a boyfriend who was considerably older than her (late 20s or early 30s, I believe) but, to be fair, she was 18 by then.

There’s a tangential Rothschilds connection here, by the way, because Nicky Hilton ended up marrying James Rothschild and Rachel used to party with all of them.

One thing you guys have missed is that she has a much deeper connection to the occult artist Marina Abramovic than I’ve seen documented so far.

Some links you might find interesting:

Rachel is the primary photographer for an artist named Terence Koh, who frequently collaborates with Abramovic. Here, he’s in a death pose on a piece of hers: http://purple.fr/diary/terence-kohon-a-work-by-marina-abramovic-at-a-collectors-house-east/ Another photo of the same set: http://purple.fr/diary/terence-kohon-a-work-by-marina-abramovic-at-the-collectors-house-east/

A video from a MoMA party: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zPPKj99ZV60YouTube List of attendees: “Those in attendance included Madonna, Mary-Kate Olsen, Yoko Ono, James Franco, Lou Reed, Patti Smith, Chloe Sevigny, Penn Badgely, Padma Lakshmi, Rose Byrne, Kim Cattrall, Lucy Liu, Marina Abramovic, Daphne Guinness, Terence Koh, Andrej Pejic, Leelee Sobieski, Cindy Sherman, Agnes Gund, Katharina Sieverding, Rachel Chandler, Michelle Harper, David Rockefeller, Jr., MoMA’s Director Glenn Lowry, Volkswagen’s Martin Winterkorn, and Director of MoMA PS1 and MoMA’s Chief Curator at Large Klaus Biesenbach.”

Rachel was a photographer/attendee at Marina Abramovic’s 2010 “The Artist is Present” performance at the MoMA http://www.patrickmcmullan.com/site/event_detail.aspx?eid=32454 (look for her name on the left-hand list of Featured People and use the filter function)

(much more at site)


1,025 posted on 03/20/2019 8:40:01 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 955 | View Replies ]


To: grey_whiskers

Q


1,027 posted on 03/20/2019 8:46:53 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1025 | View Replies ]

To: grey_whiskers

Posting blind:

Red Shoes = Pope Benedict


1,029 posted on 03/20/2019 8:47:27 PM PDT by MNDude (Stop the crazy conspires)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1025 | View Replies ]

To: grey_whiskers; KMac1945; ransomnote; TEXOKIE

Strike when and where it is least expected.

So, the 2 lawyers who filed today want to prevent release—presumably—of Epstein Island information. Individuals in NXIVM are beginning to plead and provide State’s Evidence.

At this point everyone is focusing on release of the Mueller report. Instead, Trump pivots and directs the attack on those who corrupt culture and destroy children and use blackmail to corrupt the politics and the law. This will involve and affect the Democrat party through their links with Epstein and NXIVM.

Then release the Mueller report; the OIG and Huber can move to the prosecution of those who ratified and participated in the corruption, the Deepstate, the Clintons, Obama.

Then? TBD

Time for bed.


1,061 posted on 03/20/2019 9:13:26 PM PDT by Pete from Shawnee Mission
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1025 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson