Posted on 03/10/2019 7:33:03 AM PDT by MNDude
In a letter released to the public for the first time, former Attorney General Jeff Sessions has been found ordering U.S. Attorney for Utah John Huber to investigate Hillary Clinton, according to watchdog group American Oversight.
The watchdog got hold of the letter after filing a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) litigation. The letter’s existence, which was written in November 2017, was denied a year later in response to American Oversight’s litigation. The Justice Department maintained that Sessions didn’t direct Huber in writing and that any order was passed verbally.
In a letter released to the public for the first time, former Attorney General Jeff Sessions has been found ordering U.S. Attorney for Utah John Huber to investigate Hillary Clinton, according to watchdog group American Oversight.
Since before the 2016 presidential elections, Donald Trump has repeatedly called for the DOJ to investigate Hillary Clinton. He often invoked the infamous “Lock her up” chant at rallies in front of his supporters — and continued his calls for prosecuting Clinton even after becoming president.
Austin Evers, American Oversight executive director, said the letter is proof that Sessions followed Trump’s arbitrary and “authoritarian” demands.
“‘Lock her up’ was wrong at campaign rallies, and it’s even worse coming from the Department of Justice. Even after this long, it’s still deeply shocking to see the black-and-white proof that Jeff Sessions caved to President Trump’s worst authoritarian impulses and ordered a wide-ranging investigation of his political opponents based on demands from Congress instead of the facts and the law.”
(Excerpt) Read more at inquisitr.com ...
Of course you did.
Being a believer in a 8chan anonymous bullshi**er forces you to live in a tiny delusional world where the only thing that matters is an undying belief in Q.
Natural for the delusional to lash out.
“Then by that analogy anybody who is a member of any political Party is a cult member”
“I didn’t ask about whether or not you had to register with a political Party.”
Classic lie by omission.
You implied. I didn’t`t state you asked. ‘Anybody who is a member of any political party is a cult member’.
One doesn’t`t have to register with any party to vote.
You’re a sad little Qtard.
LOL@ “What did I do? Did I address a relevant part of your comment without addressing other parts that were less relevant to the point I was making? “
There is no help, other than possibly Thorazine, for someone who completely misinterprets ellipsis.
Pathetic little Qtard.
Classic lie by omission.Oh, that's rich!
I didn’t`t state you asked. ‘Anybody who is a member of any political party is a cult member’.
What I said was this...Then by that analogy anybody who is a member of any political Party is a cult member.
Who is the one omitting things?
LOL
Lie by Omission AGAIN. The full comment:
“Then by that analogy anybody who is a member of any political Party is a cult member”
“I didn’t ask about whether or not you had to register with a political Party.”
Classic lie by omission.
You implied. I didn’t`t state you asked. ‘Anybody who is a member of any political party is a cult member’.
One doesn’t`t have to register with any party to vote.
You’re a sad little Qtard.
Then you better double up your dosage because you need it way more than me.
I simply asked - You have political Parties in Canada, don't you?
That's a question.
Even a dullard like you can answer such a simple question.
All it requires is a "yes, we have political parties in Canada" or a "no, we don't have political parties in Canada" answer.
You can even copy and paste the appropriate answer in your reply.
LOL
Fun playing defence on your own 1 yard line Qtard?
You implied. I didn’t`t state you asked.Then you lied by omission.
Of course, Thorazine has no effect on anencephalic intellectuals aka Qtards.
I may be on the 1 yard line, but you're still in the locker room.
That should make for some interesting reading, don't you think?
LOL@So you can’t answer a simple question.
Major difference between cannot and won’t.
The deflection from your Lie by Omission is juvenile and expected from an anencephalic intellect.
But hey, Qtards are gullible and stupid.
“Interview With FBI’s Gaeta, Central to Russiagate, Among 53 Transcripts Slated for Release”
old news.
https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000166-1a8b-d20d-a57f-9e9b4ab10001
Okay. Why won't you answer the question?
At least you're admitting that your inaction is by design!
LOL@ “That’s the list. I was referring to the transcripts themselves. “
Distinction without difference.One is a list, the other is a story on the internet about the list.
Anencephalic intellect trying to be too clever by 1/2
LOL@ “Okay. Why won’t you answer the question?”
Answer a deflection from your original idiocy!?
Ahhh, poor little Qtard anencephalic intellectual. Trying to hard to be clever.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.