Jeff Sessions’ Letter Shows DOJ Followed Trump’s Demand To Investigate Hillary Clinton

Inquistr ^

[MNDude]

In a letter released to the public for the first time, former Attorney General Jeff Sessions has been found ordering U.S. Attorney for Utah John Huber to investigate Hillary Clinton, according to watchdog group American Oversight.

The watchdog got hold of the letter after filing a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) litigation. The letter’s existence, which was written in November 2017, was denied a year later in response to American Oversight’s litigation. The Justice Department maintained that Sessions didn’t direct Huber in writing and that any order was passed verbally.

In a letter released to the public for the first time, former Attorney General Jeff Sessions has been found ordering U.S. Attorney for Utah John Huber to investigate Hillary Clinton, according to watchdog group American Oversight.

Since before the 2016 presidential elections, Donald Trump has repeatedly called for the DOJ to investigate Hillary Clinton. He often invoked the infamous “Lock her up” chant at rallies in front of his supporters — and continued his calls for prosecuting Clinton even after becoming president.

Austin Evers, American Oversight executive director, said the letter is proof that Sessions followed Trump’s arbitrary and “authoritarian” demands.

“‘Lock her up’ was wrong at campaign rallies, and it’s even worse coming from the Department of Justice. Even after this long, it’s still deeply shocking to see the black-and-white proof that Jeff Sessions caved to President Trump’s worst authoritarian impulses and ordered a wide-ranging investigation of his political opponents based on demands from Congress instead of the facts and the law.”

[Para-Ord.45]

“You must really hate the POTUS and those who support him. “

Irrational for anyone to state one can hate someone they never met personally based on small degrees of ideology.

To cling to a desperate white- knight- will- save- us- just- wait belief is the opposite of my pro-active philosophy.

[Para-Ord.45]

You must be the emotional support ?

[philman_36]

...or philosophical beliefs...

Then by that analogy anybody who is a member of any political Party is a cult member.

You have political Parties in Canada, don't you?
What political Party do you belong to?

[philman_36]

...my pro-active philosophy.

Your pro-active philosophy is trolling.

[Para-Ord.45]

Conflating a political party with a platform, members one can see, chairmen, building with offices, with an anonymous poster on a pornchan site is, well, laughable.

One doesn’t`t have to register with any political party in Canada.

[Para-Ord.45]

Conflating revealing facts concerning Qtips with trolling is also laughable.

Don’t like the facts then inform Jim the boss and let the chips falls where they may.

[CJ Wolf]

You must be on fire. How I see you through this plain of text. Get help.

[Para-Ord.45]

Get that from 8chan?

[philman_36]

Conflating a political party with a platform...
A platform IS composed of the philosophical beliefs of a given Party, isn't it?
That's not conflating the Party to the platform, that's defining the Party by their platform.

[CJ Wolf]

No, your transmom gave it to me. She raised you better then this.

[philman_36]

Don’t like the facts...
Assumptions, conjecture, speculation and out right lies are not facts.

[Para-Ord.45]

CNN lifts out of context. Sad a Q cultist does likewise:

Conflating a political party with a platform, members one can see, chairmen, building with offices, with an anonymous poster on a pornchan site is, well, laughable.

[philman_36]

Get that from 8chan?

You can't figure that out?
Hint...right click on the image.
Pick view image info on the flyout.
It gives this...

https://memegenerator.net/img/instances/66073409/oh-god-im-on-fire-help-me-stop-the-sydonian-government.jpg

Simple.

[Para-Ord.45]

Sarcasm.

You can’t get that.

That was obvious.

Better run and tell Jim.

[philman_36]

CNN lifts out of context. Sad a Q cultist does likewise:
I didn't take anything out of context.
I only needed that small part to blow your argument out of the water.

See (...) ellipses. (Ellipses save space or remove material that is less relevant.)

[philman_36]

Better run and tell Jim.
Why would I need to bother him?
I don't need anybody to fight my battles or carry my water for me.

[Para-Ord.45]

Jim Acosta believes he’s doing the same bang up job you are.

Except of course we all know he’s delusional.

[Para-Ord.45]

LOL@See (...) ellipses.

Once again a misinterpretation. You omitted the relevant part. Exact opposite of ellipses.

You obviously needed the emotional support of your fellow travellers who coincidentally show up at the most opportune moment

[philman_36]

One doesn’t`t have to register with any political party in Canada.
I didn't ask about whether or not you had to register with a political Party. Want to try again?

You have political Parties in Canada, don't you?

You know you do, you've as much as admitted it!
You can do it! Just say it!

[philman_36]

You omitted the relevant part.
No, I didn't. You may believe I did, but you're lying to yourself.
I addressed the only part of your comment that needed to be addressed.

You obviously needed the emotional support of your fellow travellers who coincidentally show up at the most opportune moment

Conjecture and assumptions are not facts.