Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: greeneyes

I’m still firmly in the camp that the NXIVM case will tie to a lot of dems.

The new indictment will likely add more defendants to the case, maybe not dems, but I the case is definitely expanding.

According to Parlato’s article, the judge can decide to try the next indictment as a whole new case in a different trial.

That’s pretty expansive, no?


438 posted on 03/01/2019 8:44:42 PM PST by KitJ (Shall not be infringed...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 425 | View Replies ]


To: KitJ

And with each new defendent, their records may very well provide new names. Q did say that Alison Mack was naming names, lots big ones.


448 posted on 03/01/2019 8:52:38 PM PST by little jeremiah (When we do notTh punish evildoers we are ripping the foundations of justice from future generations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 438 | View Replies ]

To: KitJ

I think it means the tangential cases are likely to be too big for one trial-maybe-hoping.


450 posted on 03/01/2019 8:54:17 PM PST by greeneyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 438 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson