Posted on 02/24/2019 10:00:16 PM PST by ransomnote
Well, those states that allow illegals to have drivers license and look the other way when illegals vote, likely think it’s ok to do this.
I’m finding it hard to believe that Red States would agree to it. However, current affairs get more and more unbelievable every day - like Congress and States voting for infanticide.
Sigh. Thanks for the essay. Makes sense.
Excellent write up. Thank you.
You answered the question I was mulling over...
“The larger issue is the Guarantee Clause of Article IV. Is it a republican form of government for a state to ignore the votes of its own citizens to appoint a slate of electors that reflects the national popular will? That will end up in the Supreme Court.”
It’s real simple. Your vote no longer counts in Colorado. Might as well stay home and let the smart people in California pick the President.
From 2016 - evidence of foreign meddling in the 2016 presidential election never followed up on by the MSM (duh).
http://freewestmedia.com/2016/11/29/merkel-gave-german-tax-money-to-hillarys-failed-campaign/
Merkel gave German tax money to Hillarys failed campaign
German taxpayers unwittingly gave Hillary Clinton millions towards her election. The donation to the Clinton Foundation from Germany's taxpayers on behalf of Angela Merkel came at the height of the US elections.
-snip-
According to a newly surfaced donor list, the Clinton charity received around $5 million from Germanys Ministry for Environment. Ministrys spokesperson said that they had very positive experience with the Clinton Foundation and the millions of dollars diverted to the Clintons were going to planting trees in countries like India, Mexico, and Vietnam.
For planting "trees"...
Investigate Hillary for collusion with Germany.
Die Welt article (auf Deutsch)
However, a state legislature, once signed on, can also rescind its participation in the agreement.
Is it a republican form of government for a state to ignore the votes of its own citizens to appoint a slate of electors that reflects the national popular will?
I am afraid that it could be. The popular vote is "democracy". Having elected officials make these decisions is representative or "republican" government.
I hope I'm missing something here.
Or, is that just the way things work over there?
Is it a republican form of government for a state to ignore the votes of its own citizens to appoint a slate of electors that reflects the national popular will? That will end up in the Supreme Court.
Yet another very important reason why a good SCOTUS is essential for the survival of our country.
Good Grief. What a mess. Can’t believe a Red state would be so foolish. Unfreakin’ believable how ignorant things are.
Ooh ooh ooh was just going to post that. Your way is better looking.
Yay to the max.
I'm not sure it has for a while. Too much Massachusetts and California up in Denver and Boulder.
Read on, looks as though it ain’t happening until both houses of Congress approve of it, and then it will go to SCOTUS.
By Odin's hammer, I just got all tingly in the pants.
I wonder if this is exclusively NK related or BIG PICTURE related. Or both.
Let the [-21] memes commence.
Stand by, citizens. I will be with you directly.
Perhaps I’m asking too much - but I have a feeling there may be discussions on reunification coming out of these talks. I’m likely hoping for too much, but just a tickle I have on my brain after reading this Q post about “BIG BIG BIG HAPPENINGS”.
Thanks, TWW. I’ve gotta bounce for a little bit.
Are you okay to keep posting drops now?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.