RE: WAR CASTLES
Watched the link for first hour of War Castles 0.
Interesting and saw that there are quite a number of War Castle lectures in the series.
Thanks for bringing it to my attention.
The Three Castles, the “War Castles” named are the ones we have been learning about in our Q studies: London, The Vatican, and Washington DC. Contract language matters, especially the grammar, and probably most of it is fraudulent, according to this clip..... He talks about the Vatican Keyhole. He discusses the three major US bankruptcies.
He speaks of how we are now in a birth certificate system which makes all of us and our future generations into chattel. An example shown is how on official documents, if your name is capitalized, as on a birth certificate, the implication is that that person is “dead,” as according to the power elite fraudulent cloaked “legal” language, capital letters of a name are connected with a tombstone, therefore death. It is this playing with grammar that our birth certificates cause a baby to be entered on the rolls as chattel, “dead” and therefore not having full rights as a “living” person. It sounds crazy at first, but he does make an interesting case.
The story is told of an individual who saw through all of this and more, and during a brief window of opportunity, managed to stop the progression of a silent final takeover of America by the power elite, according to the presenter. He is asking people to learn of this and to research it for yourselves.
The topic is vast, and I in no way do justice to the material covered by that small hint I wrote above. I consider it to be intriguing food for thought. And as you indicate, Enigo54, if true, it’s incredible.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=izmJIRUeD6s. WC 0
RE: WAR CASTLES
Watched the link for first hour of War Castles 0.
Interesting and saw that there are quite a number of War Castle lectures in the series.
~~~~~~~
You weren’t away long but I missed ya. Hope you had enough time for urgent personal projects - you still have time off stacking up on your Q thread payroll records. Glad you are back shoveling away - makes it seem like all is well.
Thanks for the notes re the video. I was glad to read your thoughts on the topic. I watched the video too but I missed the fact that there are more of these.
I recognize some of the info having encountered it before (April LaJune includes some of this info from another vantage point) and I think I accidentally took notes on this issue about 11 years ago - it might have been the same man referenced earlier in his quest.
Although the content does initially vibrate like some events we have studied on the Q thread, after wrestling with it in my mind for awhile, I no longer think it is Q content.
We’ve seen what the DS does to people who get in their way - why is this man still alive? Andrew Breitbart gone, but the man who is said to have single-handedly halted a 200 year plan to strip the US of its sovereignty and hand it to Britain was almost beaten to death and then ignored?
I accept that Hillary kills people for far less, and if a plane loaded with passengers goes down along with her target, she doesn’t care. But this man was first beaten and then ignored and continues to be critical threat to the DS? Doesn’t sound right - look what it takes to protect POTUS from assassination and this man doesn’t have branches of the US military to protect him.
But some details collected in this story sound right - so (the sum of) something isn’t right (why is part “true” and part “wrong).
At the end of the video, the narrator asserts that the US government must recognize the importance of this man’s request to meet to resolve this issue or the Deep State will step in (expressed with urgency - before it’s too late). I believe the video indicates this man’s requests to meet with gov have been ignored/declined. I don’t believe POTUS’s administration would ignore requests to save America, or that Q would have failed to point us to support this man or his effort if needed. I think Q/POTUS would have identified him and found him, met with him etc.
Part of the video gave me a double-take; basically this man is said to be, per technicality, CINC and is willing to recognize POTUS as legitimate. This sets off warning bells. I believe that it would be a grave mistake to recognize an unelected individual as having the right to identify (or not) the President as legitimate. I think to do so would set a toxic precedent and it makes me doubt this man’s honesty or that of people perhaps interested in using him. Can he withdraw his approval of POTUS, withhold it and assign to another - just seems wrong.
It was an interesting tour of information and some of the strategies ring true, but I won’t invest in the (many) other videos unless Q points that way - especially now that we are getting drops that are going to keep me awake at night! :D
Far better than I could have done. Thank You!