Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: TEXOKIE; Enigo54; Cats Pajamas; greeneyes; bagster; generally; Wneighbor; mairdie; Swordmaker

RE: WAR CASTLES

Watched the link for first hour of War Castles 0.

Interesting and saw that there are quite a number of War Castle lectures in the series.
~~~~~~~

You weren’t away long but I missed ya. Hope you had enough time for urgent personal projects - you still have time off stacking up on your Q thread payroll records. Glad you are back shoveling away - makes it seem like all is well.

Thanks for the notes re the video. I was glad to read your thoughts on the topic. I watched the video too but I missed the fact that there are more of these.

I recognize some of the info having encountered it before (April LaJune includes some of this info from another vantage point) and I think I accidentally took notes on this issue about 11 years ago - it might have been the same man referenced earlier in his quest.

Although the content does initially vibrate like some events we have studied on the Q thread, after wrestling with it in my mind for awhile, I no longer think it is Q content.

We’ve seen what the DS does to people who get in their way - why is this man still alive? Andrew Breitbart gone, but the man who is said to have single-handedly halted a 200 year plan to strip the US of its sovereignty and hand it to Britain was almost beaten to death and then ignored?

I accept that Hillary kills people for far less, and if a plane loaded with passengers goes down along with her target, she doesn’t care. But this man was first beaten and then ignored and continues to be critical threat to the DS? Doesn’t sound right - look what it takes to protect POTUS from assassination and this man doesn’t have branches of the US military to protect him.

But some details collected in this story sound right - so (the sum of) something isn’t right (why is part “true” and part “wrong).

At the end of the video, the narrator asserts that the US government must recognize the importance of this man’s request to meet to resolve this issue or the Deep State will step in (expressed with urgency - before it’s too late). I believe the video indicates this man’s requests to meet with gov have been ignored/declined. I don’t believe POTUS’s administration would ignore requests to save America, or that Q would have failed to point us to support this man or his effort if needed. I think Q/POTUS would have identified him and found him, met with him etc.

Part of the video gave me a double-take; basically this man is said to be, per technicality, CINC and is willing to recognize POTUS as legitimate. This sets off warning bells. I believe that it would be a grave mistake to recognize an unelected individual as having the right to identify (or not) the President as legitimate. I think to do so would set a toxic precedent and it makes me doubt this man’s honesty or that of people perhaps interested in using him. Can he withdraw his approval of POTUS, withhold it and assign to another - just seems wrong.

It was an interesting tour of information and some of the strategies ring true, but I won’t invest in the (many) other videos unless Q points that way - especially now that we are getting drops that are going to keep me awake at night! :D


465 posted on 02/16/2019 11:24:26 PM PST by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 390 | View Replies ]


To: ransomnote

new Qs


466 posted on 02/16/2019 11:28:20 PM PST by bitt (new q post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 465 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote; Cats Pajamas; greeneyes; bagster; generally; Wneighbor; mairdie; Swordmaker; ...

RE: WAR CASTLES

“...Part of the video gave me a double-take; basically this man is said to be, per technicality, CINC and is willing to recognize POTUS as legitimate. This sets off warning bells. I believe that it would be a grave mistake to recognize an unelected individual as having the right to identify (or not) the President as legitimate. I think to do so would set a toxic precedent and it makes me doubt this man’s honesty or that of people perhaps interested in using him. Can he withdraw his approval of POTUS, withhold it and assign to another - just seems wrong.

It was an interesting tour of information and some of the strategies ring true, but I won’t invest in the (many) other videos unless Q points that way - especially now that we are getting drops that are going to keep me awake at night! :D
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Thanks for your kind words, Oh Mother of Dragons (and Dragonlets!)

Thank you also ransomnote, for your examination of that video. You have articulated so well some of the things which I had found troubling, but had not clearly formulated.

I can understand the legal manipulation with grammar, and I hope that understanding is paid attention to. I think he has indeed discovered something of worth for all of us in that regard.

However, it amazes me that the UN would have given him credence. How would they have known that the flag which is said to have taken from the Pentagon was THE (magic) FLAG...and given him the sovereignty of the whole North American continent??? The UN is, as we all know, full of derps. It is difficult for me to envision their just rolling over like that. Your final point about POTUS recognition is disturbing as well.

I appreciate having your assessment that this material is not appropriate Q material.


473 posted on 02/16/2019 11:46:27 PM PST by TEXOKIE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 465 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson